- Blog
- Bios
- Boards
- Classifieds
- DIY
- Gallery
- Vendor Reviews
- Shop Weddingbee
I'm having a dilemma my fellow bees. Ok So I come a huge family and so does my Fi we also have a very large group of friends. My issue is i NEED to keep my wedding to about 130-150 ppl and i have to limit the +1's. My initial idea is Married Couples, My Bridal Party and If I know your SO then you get a plus 1 but if I have never met them or you just started dating you don't. This has been going VERY well, until my one guest (friend) called me "Rude and Insulting" he says "Its like me inviting you FI to the wedding and not you" I corrected him and said "No its not because you know me, we're friends," He said "Its your wedding do what you want, but you're going to piss off A LOT of ppl" Ugh and then i got nervous because i know he's probably right. Any idea's or help?
I'm doing the same thing and I have not heard any complaints. If they are engaged they get a plus one, but if i don't know them and they are just dating they aren't invited. Honestly I dont really care to have people i dont know at my wedding.
I don't think it's rude or insulting. You can't be expected to invite a bunch of people you don't know! :)
Engaged, live together, or know them well seems to be like a good rule of thumb. People will just have to get over themselves.
I was living with my boyfriend (now FI) and didn't get invited to a wedding that he was going to and I was PISSED. At the same time, I am not giving everyone a plus one, but if I know they are dating someone, even if I haven't met the person, they are invited. If they are single, unless they are in the wedding party, they aren't getting a +1.
Just make sure that whatever criteria you use to determine who is invited / who isn't, you apply it to every single guest. That way no one can say "so-and-so's girlfriend got invited but mine didn't and we've been together for the same amount of time."
to the OP, I think it's rude of the person who called you to tell you you were being rude!
I think if the guest has a serious significant other, then they should be invited. Also your wedding party should get plus 1's. I also think people that do not know any other guests should get plus 1's so they at least have someone to hang out with.
I'm picking and choosing my +1's... we have some university friends coming from another city and they will all be sitting together. Since they all know each other and are not in serious relationships I don't see the need for me to pay for randoms to eat :)
However, I do have a few people coming who won't know many others so I'm giving them the +1 option
I plan to treat social units as social units. If you're truly single when the invitations go out, and you start dating someone after, then too dern bad! Lol- if someone is in a relationship then they get their +1. Depending on how our final list looks, we are also considering giving +1's to out of town guests who won't know anyone else.
I agree with the PP, it's incredibly rude of that guest to do that to you. I think the general etiquette rule is to invite +1 if the person is engaged, live-in partners and for people who will not know anyone else. Ie. A cousin does not need/get to invite his latest girlfriend of 4 days. As a member of an extended family who believes in "the more the merrier" my guest list could easily go from 100 to 150 in a matter of seconds.
I think most people realize that weddings are expensive and if only their name is on the invite it's just meant for them. However, there will always be those people who ask so you could say, "I am so sorry, but due to space limitations we simply cannot accomodate extra guests." I feel for you!! I am not looking forward to sending out invites because of this.
I was complaining to my mom about this yesterday and she said, "Engaged, living together or married. You have to draw the line somewhere." So I did!
I think it's rude to expect your guests to attend an event alone. I have declined a wedding in the past because my then boyfriend was not invited. We weren't living together yet (had been togther for a year though), but it was a serious relationship and not just some fling. It was insulting that my relationship was considered "not as important", so I don't get to bring someone. Weddings are all about love and relationships, and you expect some people to sit there alone? If they choose not to bring a guest, thats fine, but at least extend the offer.
I’ve been on the other side of this equation. When my coworker/friend was married a few years ago, I was invited without DH (BF at the time – we had been living together for almost 5 years at this point). She made it a point to say that only those who were married would get a +1. DH doesn’t really know her well and probably wouldn’t have attended the wedding anyway but it did sting a little especially since we had been together for so long and we were hardly just boyfriend and girlfriend. Not that it really matters but we had also been together longer than she and her soon to be hubby but my relationship wasn’t committed enough to get a +1. I still went and enjoyed myself but it would have been nice if she could have extended my long time, live in boyfriend an invitation.
With that said, she had a guest list of like 55 and adding one more wouldn’t have affected anything but in your situation, it seems like space is the real issue. I think the general “married, engaged or living together” rule is probably a good one to follow. You may have some one-offs with special circumstances (like they’ve been dating for years but don’t fit into any of the above categories) that I would probably include but if you’ve never met the SO, it doesn’t really make any sense to extend an invitation to them. It was important to us that we knew every single person at our wedding which is why we didn’t give +1’s to those who would more than likely bring their flavor of the week.
No one is EVER entitled to be invited to a party unless they paid for it. That includes weddings. Your friend was very rude. If they don't like your guest list, they do not have to come.
I'm going through the whole plus one deal now, and it is a big PITA. I'm doing basically the same thing you describe--plus ones to the bridal party and people in longterm relationships, otherwise no plus ones. Everyone invited to the wedding knows other people who will be there, so no one without a plus one will be awkward or lonely. I think what you're doing is totally fine, as long as everyone knows other people there. Try to ignore that guy, you just can't please everyone I guess, but I think @deathbydesign said it best: no one is entitled to be invited to a party.
I can understand why people want to have a date at a wedding, but honestly, if you just started dating, then it's not my responsibility to pay for your random date to eat for the night. If the two of you want a "date night" then arrange for one between the two of you. A wedding is about having people around you that love and support you, not random strangers that only serve the purpose of being your arm candy for the evening.
Because of this, we're inviting people who are engaged or living together or dating for more than 6 months and we've met them and +1's for our bridal party. Anyone else, even long time friends and some family members are not getting a date. The last time one of my long time friends invited a "date" to an event it was a total train wreck, the guy was a total bigot and proceeding to hit on me the whole night even though I was with my FI. And all so my friend wasn't "single" for the night. Not worth it IMO. I'd rather just have my friend there whose company I can enjoy and who isn't forced to entertain some random dude that's just taking up space...
@Bostongrl25: I don't think its rude at all, i think ppl take the whole "ettiquette" thing out of proportion. My FI cowoker got married and invited him and not me and i was ok with that because basically i had NEVER met this guy in my life. I think people are just entirely TOO sensitve
@allieluvs21: In my opinion, it's not an etiquette thing or being overly senstive. It's just rude.
@Bostongrl25: what classifies it as being rude? I'm not trying to come off in a mean way by any means. I'm just trying to understand where you are coming from. I Just don't see the big deal in going to a wedding Solo
@allieluvs21: To me, rude is expecting your guests to attend a wedding solo. Like I said above, I declined a wedding invite when my then boyfriend wasn't invited. It wasn't a fling, and we actually moved in together a few weeks after the wedding. To me it's rude for the bride & groom to pick and choose which couples are more commited to eachother and thus allowed to bring a guest.
Its not rude at all... I suggest you tell that friend if he wants a date he can pay for his her haha no Im just kiding, but seriously its unreasonable for people to expect to have some random person at a very personal and expensive day... our guests are only getting a +1 if they live togethe, married, engaged or have been together long enough that I know the person, and the brodal party gets +1s, but if someone is to my knowledge single, they do not get a plus 1, I do not think very many people will be upset about your decision!
well, i think it's tough to tell someone that basically their relationship is not serious enough to warrant an invite. if someone is in a relationship, they should get to bring that person whether it's 6 months or 6 years.
that said, i totally get not wanting to invite someone who is completely single and will bring just a friend or random person. the only exception would be if the person didn't know anyone else at the wedding.
I was invited to a wedding a couple years ago and my now-FI (then-BF) wasn't. I was a bit surprised, but at the end of the day it's a space thing. No biggie.
As a guest, I'm there to celebrate the couple's union. It's about THEM.
For our guestlist, I'm extending plus 1's to married couples, living together, together for a long time, or if you're from out of town.
@Bostongrl25: Yeah, I think I'll have to politely disagree on this as well. Someone else's wedding isn't about evaluating the legitimacy of another couple's committment, it's about being surrounded by those close to you. Regardless of level of committment to each other, if a couple isn't inviting plus ones it is likely one of two reasons:
- to save money
- to be surrounded only by their closest pals
In either one of these scenarios, a plus one they don't know well just doesn't cut the mustard. It's not personal, and I would think a friend would be happy to share their big day with them regardless of who they're invited with.
(I do understand exceptions for people who don't know others at the wedding, though. But if you have friends and family going, I don't see the big deal)
It has been my long standing belief that any adult should be extended the courtesy of a guest. When planning my wedding a fully planned for every single adult to be 2 not 1. In the end, most of the people who were not in relationships came solo anyway. In my opinion, no one has the right to judge whether or not another person's relationship is "serious enough." BUT, I seem to be in the minority from what I have read on here and it is your wedding, so you have to do what works for you. Not everyone will agree and yes, some will think it's rude, but in the end it's your decision.
@Heartly: When the couple starts making all these rules about living together, engaged, bridal party date, etc. then the couple is making judgements. For example, if my SO and I moved in together after a month of dating, we would have been invited as a couple. However, since we waited a year to move in together, we were deemed "not as serious", and I was invited alone. Doesn't make much sense to me.
The OP has the right to do whatever she thinks is best, since it's her wedding.
My fiance and I strugged with this too. What we did was to have +1s for everyone we knew was in a relationship at the time the invites went out. So that included all engaged, living together, and people who were dating but not living together. If you hadn't introduced us to your SO or we didn't know that person existed (ie it wasn't on facebook), then you didn't get a +1. We haven't gotten any complaints on this.
stop worrying about other people's comments. i think it's totally acceptable not to give +1s to YOUR WEDDING.
it makes sense with family because theyll have other people to hangout with and can feel comfortable even w/o their s/o.
one tip is if it's someone you're inviting, that wont know anyone else, id consider either NOT inviting them or giving them a plus one. i went to a coworkers wedding where i know i got a pity +1 :) but it's cause i only wouldve known her at the wedding!
I just got message today from a friend of mine "I can't wait for your wedding! I'll be there, kids in tow!" I had her down as a +1, thinking she was bringing her boyfriend. She has decided instead of her boyfriend she would rather bring her 9,6 and 4 yr old. So my generous +1 has turned into a +3. And she already knows I ok'd other people to bring their kids (my neices and nephews) I feel bad now because that is more than I planned, but hopefully we will make it up somewhere else.
@Bostongrl25: I definitely get what you're saying about using rules like 'engaged' or 'living together' - which was my original suggestion. It's true, cause those definitions really don't mean anything in terms of who knows the couple, which is what I would deem most important (for me).
IMO...unless I know both halves of the couple - no ring, no bring.
the only exception is if that person would know no one else at the wedding (which is highly unlikely).
It's not like i'm asking someone to go somewhere solo. Everyone in their circle of friends will be there.
Im having this same issue!! I want everyone to be comfortable, and I want to give some of my cousins and friends plus ones, but its becoming hard! I have a very limited amount of people I can have at the venue, and obviously quiet a few people wont come, but I'm still way over on the guest list. I either let cousins and friends have plus ones, or cut out people that I want there. They might be mad, but people need to understand with this sort of thing.
I know the +1 rule for living together, engaged, or married sounds like it makes sense and is fair, but it isn't as easy as it sounds. My BF's coworker is getting married in May and sending out invitations sometime in February. At that time my BF and I will be "just dating". Well, we will be engaged and announcing it by the end of the month and will most likely be living together by that wedding. It puts everyone in an awkward position because if I am not invited, it is weird socially (you aren't going to put an engaged man at a singles table, are you?). This happens a ton where I live (summer leases are common, so that's when the moving and weddings happen. The rule I hope is follow is official couples, invited with the names, and keep sleeping arrangements and cold feet out of it.
what we did was if you are engaged, living together, serious, then you're invited. We invited DH's little 17-year old cousin and her boyfriend because they have been dating for 2 years. But, I'm not going to invite my dear friends and a random +1. If I invite someone who won't know anyone, they get a +1.
After all the planning I have done, I no longer am afriad to hurt someone's feelings. I am having 237 ppl and space is an issue. I don't think you will "piss off" anyone...except for those very sensitive peeps that don't understand what goes into a wedding! If it makes you feel better i told my cousin if she was desperate to have a plus one he had to come after dinner. I have no space for him. I know you aren't supposed to tell people that but I don't know him and she really wants him there. Don't worry about putting your foot down and drawing a line.
@Angelz_love: Thats my issue, the limit of people i can have in the venue is way over at the moment. So I'm gunna have to put my foot down...it sucks, but oh well!!
I feel like...if they care matter they won't mind. if they mind, they don't matter.
People who are close to you will understand why you have to make hard decisions. If they don't understand, they probably aren't as important to you as someone else you would be able to invite.
I personally am going with Miss Manners for my wedding - there are no +1s, only named guests. So, for example, my cousin has been dating a guy for a couple of years, so I'm getting his name and address and sending his own invite. Couples living together/married will have both names on the invite.
Some people don't believe in living together before marriage - if you know someone's in a serious relationship then I really think you should invite them. If you don't know whether a guest is in a serious rel, then they're not close enough to you to get to invite someone else, IMO.
I know it's important to keep the guest list under control, but I agree that trying to judge whose relationship is worthy and whose isn't is too petty for such an important occasion. If you can't afford all serious SOs, then is there something else you can downgrade to include them?
We're pretty far out, but as of right now, we are planning on giving +1s to our single friends and family, even if they aren't in relationships. Luckily, the majority of our friends are married, engaged or in otherwise serious, long-term relationships. However, I wouldn't feel right not allowing a single friend to bring a date if they wanted to. I understand not wanting/being able to do that, but I guess I would feel guilty and feel like I was discriminating against any friends and family for not being in committed relationships.
You must log in to post.
| Visit our sister sites | eHarmony Online Dating |
eHarmony Advice Dating Advice |
Project Wedding Wedding Songs |
JustMommies Pregnancy Calendar |

| User | Posts Today |
|---|---|
| ellisrobertson | 22 |
| MsPanda | 14 |
| aduarte3201 | 14 |
| pengoala | 11 |
| ShellVee | 10 |
| ladyartichoke | 9 |
| londonchick | 9 |
| londonpeach84 | 8 |
KimKimmieKim |
8 |
| ndreighton | 7 |
Sorry, there are no users yet.