2mm or 2.7mm engagement ring/wedding band set

posted 2 years ago in Rings
Post # 2
9137 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper
  • Wedding: November 2013 - St. Augustine Beach, FL

theeebride007:  I’m not a fan of channel set diamonds but the first one looked the best to me.

Post # 3
8585 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: December 2013

I like 3 the best!  I have a size 3.5 finger and my engagement ring and wedding band are both 2.5mm ..pic for reference

Post # 4
2007 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: October 2014

Mine is similar, 2.4mm channel-set band with a princess cut center stone..I’m partial to #3 because it looks a lot like mine, but the side stones are bigger than the ones in my band.

Post # 5
577 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: April 2012

I personally like the look of #1 best because it has the smallest diamonds in the band and I feel that makes the center stone stand out more. But if you want to be able to really see the diamonds in the band, get #2. I like my wedding band to be wide enough to wear on its own, and 1.9mm wouldn’t be quite substantial enough for me. With #3 the bands don’t have the same width all the way around, and that would bother me. But I do like the cathedral setting more than the others. So many things to think about!

Post # 6
1527 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: August 2015

I personally love thinner bands, and I think it makes the center stone pop. When shopping, I thought even 2 mm bands was too thick for my taste. I went with a 1.6 mm band. I would definitely go with the 1.9. Even if it seems thin on its own, I think an almost 3 mm engagement ring plus a 3 mm wedding band would be very wide – vs an 1.9 ring and band.

  • This reply was modified 2 years, 5 months ago by  littleanchor.
Leave a comment

Sent weekly. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Find Amazing Vendors