Advice needed!

posted 3 years ago in Photos/Videos
Post # 3
Member
11740 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: November 1999

We had a very similar wedding to you — we had one photographer for ten hours.  We ended up with something like 2000 photos, so it was definitely sufficient. 

Post # 4
Member
668 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: November 2014

I don’t know what your budget is or where in CT you are, but look up Karol Setlak. For $3k we are getting engagement photos (shot them recently, photog was awesome and I can’t wait to see the pics), 8h coverage day of (our wedding will be 6.5h long from ceremony to end of reception) with a 2nd photog, and a high res flash drive with rights to all our pics. His albums are nice too, if you want one (we don’t). The photog just upgraded all his stuff to high end Nikon and doesn’t have to hide behind black and white photos or trendy photoshop enhancements to produce beautiful photos.

I’d get a second photog, especially if you plan on having an “unplugged” ceremony.

Good luck in your search!!!

Post # 5
Member
1721 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: May 2014

@TTReverie:  I think eight hours will be more than enough time! For me, it was important to have two photographers because everyone sees things so different and I want to get those different points of views.  But i also wanted to make sure that they were 2 photographers and not 1 photographer and 1 assistant (We’re also having about 130 people as well)

Leave a comment


Sent weekly. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Find Amazing Vendors