Diamond ring band decision- round brilliant diamond HELP

posted 2 years ago in Rings
  • poll: Which setting do you prefer??
    Double band : (10 votes)
    20 %
    Single band : (40 votes)
    80 %
  • Post # 2
    8586 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: December 2013

    I like the single band best. It definitely more classic than the double band.

    Post # 3
    1517 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: February 2012

    I prefer the look of the single band. It’s not as busy and all the attention will be paid to your stone (which I would love to see). 🙂

    Post # 4
    7911 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: September 2015

    I think with the single band the focus is on the rock, the double band is a bit distracting. Single is def more classic

    Post # 5
    1349 posts
    Bumble bee

    idk…the double band may not look the best/be distracting…but it’s definitely more interesting! that’s why i voted for it.

    Post # 6
    706 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2014

    Harriet1234:  I think the double band is cool.  It’s different with out being “out there”. I would go with the double personally. But truly its up to what would fit your style better.  

    Post # 7
    612 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: June 2015

    I definitely like the single band better.  The double band may look “off” when you add a wedding ring to it due to how the different textures would line up.

    Post # 8
    5 posts

    The finer single band is the prettiest 🙂

    Post # 9
    4910 posts
    Honey bee

    Harriet1234:  I voted for the double band because I tend to like a thicker band, in general. But all the PPs who mentioned pros for the single band have very good points! It’s really hard to decide, just based on a computer image, how the ring will look in real life … and how it will look once you put wedding bands with it. For me, the double band and the differences in texture wouldn’t feel distracting. But I agree with PPs that the single band is more classic.

    I have a rose gold wedding band that is 2.5 mm thick. Although it doesn’t have a stone, I’ll include a picture of it so that you can get some idea of what 2.5 mm might look like on a finger in real life. Unfortunately, I don’t have a picture of the band by itself. (I thought I did but couldn’t find one. >.O) Apologies for that!

    Post # 10
    105 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: April 2016

    I like the single band, especially if you’re looking for a more timeless look. They are both pretty though! 

    Post # 11
    431 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: December 2015

    I voted single band but to answer your question about the double band, 2.5 mm total (I assume that means for both the bands together) is not very big.  My band is a bit smaller so it won’t help you to see, but maybe some other people can post their bands.  It would defnitely not be a thick band.

    Good luck!

    Post # 12
    4910 posts
    Honey bee

    Harriet1234:  Sorry for posting a second time. I grabbed a couple of quick pics of my 2.5 mm band on its own. Again, no stone, but it might give you a better idea of how wide the band is in real life, and I think it’s easier to see when it is by itself. I would have edited my previous post to replace the picture, but too much time had passed. >.O

    As “honeybee2014” mentioned, it is not a wide or big band at all. (For reference, I wear a size 8 and this ring is sized to 8.5.)


    Post # 13
    1317 posts
    Bumble bee

    I like the single but you could look at going a little bit wider. With a 1.5ct centre a 2 or 2.5mm band will not distract from the stone. If anything, it may balance it out better. I think mine is 2.2 but my centre is only .75 so I feel that does take away from it a bit.

    I agree with a PP, the double is pretty cool as it’s unique but you may struggle to find a wedding band that suits. 

    Leave a comment

    Sent weekly. You may unsubscribe at any time.

    Find Amazing Vendors