E-ring ADVICE Please!! Large oval diamond coming tomorrow!!!

posted 3 years ago in Rings
Post # 3
Member
1625 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2014

@Melithehoneybee:  I don’t think there will be any way to make a 2.5ct diamond look small! The setting is gorgeous. But you can definitely simplify! Maybe even just thin the setting out slightly so the stone is more showcased?

Post # 4
Member
3222 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: April 2015

If you have long fingers, ovals will give you great finger coverage! I have average length fingers but skinny/size 4 and a 1.5 carat oval was totally overwhelming. From the CAD, the setting looks really busy but the picture you posted is so beautiful and sparkly. You can also change your setting, so don’t worry. Just wait for your ring to come and I bet you’ll fall in love with it 🙂

Post # 5
Member
11772 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: May 2013

I think it looks STUNNING! Especially if you have long, thin fingers… It will be incredible as-is!

Post # 6
Member
288 posts
Helper bee

I agree, it will look great for finger coverage! I tried on a 1.7 on my baby hands with size 4 fingers – it looked like a fake cocktail ring. I also agree with PP that if you want a simpler setting, that’s an easy fix.

Post # 8
Member
2150 posts
Buzzing bee

gorgeous! What about just the solitare, no side stones?

 

Post # 12
Member
570 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 1993

I love it either way!  It is gorgeous!  

Post # 13
Member
1656 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: August 2012

@MichiganGirl24:  I agree! I’m a sucker for a classic solitaire, especially a large oval. Maybe with a little extra bling on the band? Some ideas…

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post # 14
Member
3222 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: April 2015

 @Melithehoneybee:  YESYESYES to Blake Lively’s setting! One of my absolute favourites 🙂 Also Rebecca Romijn has a beautiful set. 

Leave a comment


Sent weekly. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Find Amazing Vendors