Eidel Precious or Laurie Sarah?!

posted 3 years ago in Rings
Post # 3
Member
1261 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: May 2014

sorry, I don’t have either, but have seen both….I know there are lots of women here who have either one or the other, so I will bump this up for you. Personally, I prefer Eidel Precious…the pieces are just beautiful! As far as durability…both look to be on the delicate side to me and I would want a ring I wouldn’t have to worry about. 

See what the others who own them have to say, I guess and decide from there…good luck!

Post # 5
Member
2622 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: September 2011

I remember reading in a few of her Etsy listings that LS had changed her band designs, about a year ago now?  She found that many were too delicate, so opted to go a little thicker on the shanks/baskets etc… for better durability.  I don’t think you could go wrong with either seller, there are plenty of girls here who have rings from both, it just comes down to whose communication do you like better, and whose designs you prefer.

Post # 5
Member
7 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: June 2016

awwroten:  Go with Laurie Sarah, their rings are handmade and well made. Eidelprecious rings are manufactured rings that’s why the  quality of her rings is terrible. Eidelprecious rins are made in China by Lord of Gem rings, they are not handmade. 

  • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by  sophia1122.
  • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by  sophia1122.
Post # 6
Member
3415 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

sophia1122:  How is it that you have come to this conclusion re EP? I am noting that you seem to have created an account purely to talk about this Etsy shop. 

Post # 7
Member
7 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: June 2016

Olivepepper:  It is not a conclusion. What I wrote is factual. Do your research. 

Post # 8
Member
3415 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

sophia1122:  Wow. rude much. All I did was ask a question about why you are so het up about this as to create a profile and post on MULTIPLE old threads without ever having a history on this site. Your answer is suffice for me to think very little of your opinion, so thanks for that at least.

Post # 9
Member
8604 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: December 2013

sophia1122:  my god! Give it a rest! We are sick of hearing about this!

Post # 10
Member
7219 posts
Busy Beekeeper
  • Wedding: June 2015

sophia1122:  actually, the onus is on you, the person making the claim, to link to the “research”. Otherwise you’re just smearing a business without proof. 

 

Post # 11
Member
3415 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

BalletParker:  Thank you, that was exactly my point. Especially as this person is a newb with a zero post history, talk about minimal credibility.

  • This reply was modified 1 year, 3 months ago by  Olivepepper.
Leave a comment


Sent weekly. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Find Amazing Vendors