Post # 1
Does anyone have either of these rings?
If so could you post photos /vid from the side view as well?
According to moissaniteco:
“The band of both rings is about 1.3mm – 1.4mm.Both sit low but 952 sits lower
Eng952 has 1mm diamonds which adds about 2.5mm to the halo of eng952
Eng192 has 1.3mm Moissanites which adds about 3mm to halo of eng192.
Does anyone know which is better style is better and why?
Post # 4
Here is a thread with Eng952 (I am 90% getting this ring myself)
Eng192 – also very lovely…very similar.
I believe the major difference is one has an actual diamond halo, while the other is moissanite. I could be mistaken though?
Post # 5
I don’t have either of these rings, but I have my eye on 192. I believe 952 has actual diamonds down the sides and on the halo, but they are slightly included diamonds so they are a bit cheaper than the moissy stones that are down the sides and on the halo of 192. Slightly included basically means they have imperfections…some examples could be clouding, cleavage, discoloration, etc…but they are so tiny that I doubt anyone would notice.
Post # 6
Here are 2 videos of my eng952, when I was searching for a suggestion for my fiance I looked everywhere for pics and videos of these two styles so I feel like I should share 🙂