Online-ordered photobook suggestions...
more by kjpugs
Worst Wedding Etiquette Offense?
Dainty engagement rings anyone?
more in Rings
Do you travel with your real ring?
Do we have to party long into the night?
more in Boards
My dress is flying for the first time.........getting worried!

Engaged but no ring- legit?

posted 2 years ago in Rings
  • 1 Members Subscribed To Topic
  • poll: If a couple is engaged but there isn't a ring yet, I think-
    It's just as legit as any ring-ed engagement : (156 votes)
    53 %
    It's more legit than a ring-ed engagement because they don't need a ring to prove anything : (9 votes)
    3 %
    It's semi-legit but I wouldn't take it as seriously : (105 votes)
    35 %
    It's not legit til there's a ring : (26 votes)
    9 %
  •  
    1.
    Member
    1,812 posts
    Buzzing bee
    kjpugs    March 20, 2010   Indianapolis, IN

    I won't say what I think but I'm wondering what you all think. And this is for an engagement where there WILL be a ring (not counting couples who are anti-ring). Pretend it's your family member or friend and let me know how you'd react...

     
    2.
    Member
    1,864 posts
    Buzzing bee
    egb    January 2010  

    The engagement is the commitment to get married and set a date on it. I was engaged 3 days before we went to buy a ring and it was official - the ring just made my finger prettier.

    What about ladies that don't WANT a ring at all? They just go from dating to married?

    :)

     
    3.
    Member Icon
    Member
    111 posts
    Blushing bee
    mSmartins10    July 31, 2010  

    The ring is just an extra. Like a birthday gift. You dont NEED a birthday gift to prove its your bday just like you dont NEED an engagement ring to prove you're engaged. But either one is always welcome! =D

     
    4.
    Member
    1,812 posts
    Buzzing bee
    kjpugs    March 20, 2010   Indianapolis, IN

    LOL yea I think someone who doesn't want a ring is a totally different story. This is more like "we're engaged but he hasn't bought the ring yet" type thing.

     
    5.
    1,906 posts
    Buzzing bee
    VirginiaMarie    January 2011   Austin, TX

    I don't know...the symbol of the ring is pretty significant in my mind.  It doesn't need to be diamond, or expensive---but SOMETHING tangible to represent the commitment is pretty important IMO.

     
    6.
    5,478 posts
    Bee Keeper
    lilyfaith    June 23, 2012   Lakeview, Chicago

    We did things this way until we had enough $$$ for the ring. We kept it fairly quiet, though, as R wanted to do a "real" proposal with the ring. To me, they were the same level of commitment. We were just making the decision not to buy beyond our means! 

     
    7.
    Member
    1,864 posts
    Buzzing bee
    egb    January 2010  

    In my eyes, all the bees in the "waiting" that have agreed with their FI that they'll get married and are starting to plan a wedding are engaged. The commitment is there, the ring is a detail.

     
    8.
    Member
    3,486 posts
    Sugar bee
    HoneyBear    March 17, 2012   Texas/ Isla Mujeres

    It may seem kinda shallow, but to me, it seems like if he is willing to save up money and sacrifice things that he wants for something that means something to the relationship, then maybe he seems more serious about it? I dunno, it sounds so wrong, but I like the fact that my FI saved up money for my ring. Its special

     
    9.
    Member
    1,942 posts
    Buzzing bee
    miss-spunkin    May 29, 2010   Midwest

    sometimes people can't afford a ring right away but they want to make the next move.

    or sometimes, the guys know that they would SUCK at picking out a ring, as was the case for my brother in law haha. Several guys shouldn't and won't be trusted with getting a ring, I had to hint at the kind of ring I wanted to my fi, just in case.. 

    I would definitely say it's legitimate. 

    I like how mSmartins put it "You dont NEED a birthday gift to prove its your bday just like you dont NEED an engagement ring to prove you're engaged."

     
    10.
    Member
    2,440 posts
    Buzzing bee
    MissHelen    November 20, 2010   California

    I was engaged for about three months before we had a ring. I suppose it would have made it more "real", but I also didn't get a big proposal either :-P I was just as engaged before the ring as after the ring.

     
    11.
    Member
    2,099 posts
    Buzzing bee
    caitlanc    September 12, 2009   Western Slope of Colorado

    A ring (or any other pretty bauble) is of course NOT necessary and this does NOT include couples who don't plan on getting a ring but I would take it a little less seriously in most instances. 

    Of course, I'm also thinking in extremes like my cousin who got engaged in hmmm... 2003? 2004? sans ring and hasn't gotten married yet.  There are a lot of individual circumstances (family doesn't love the guy, etc.) but I don't consider her as engaged as say my friends who just got engaged (with a ring) this winter and are getting married next fall.  Ok, so maybe the ring doesn't really have anything to do with it at all.  I retract my vote a little bit.  :-)

     
    12.
    Member
    3,677 posts
    Sugar bee
    hilsy85    September 2010  

    I get people not considering themselves engaged if they don't have a ring. What I don't get is people who are planning their wedding (may have actually put down deposits on things/bought wedding related items) but still don't consider themselves engaged. Undecided

    To me, if you're actively planning a wedding, you're engaged. With or without the ring. Of course, you can be NOT planning the wedding, without a ring, and still be engaged as well!

     
    13.
    Member
    1,864 posts
    Buzzing bee
    egb    January 2010  

    Funny how the vast majority of posters think that it's completely legit without a ring, but votes do not reflect that. I'd be curious for the rationale of those who voted that it's semi-legit but not too serious (majority of votes)?

     
    14.
    Member
    1,812 posts
    Buzzing bee
    kjpugs    March 20, 2010   Indianapolis, IN

    I'll put it out there since you asked... to me, it's semi-legit. This recently popped up for a family member of DH's and we were all a little... mmmm. DH and I knew we'd be getting married but waited for him to save up and bought a house, etc. We waited til it felt RIGHT for us. Now who is to say if it just felt RIGHT for this person we're talking about? Perhaps it did. I consider it semi-legit for that reason, and since I think half of it is just putting it out there that you're committing to each other forever. HOWEVER, I think that's a private committment and a ring is a symbol of it. If you are GOING to get a ring, I think you're not engaged til you have one. I wouldn't have considered myself engaged without it. It meant a lot that he saved up and we did a lot of reasearch. I think there are plenty of inexpensive yet beautiful promise rings (mine was about $200 and DH got it for me a year before proposing) that you could use as a stand-in ring until picking out another ring. If you're like "We're engaged but he's saving up for the ring" my first gut reaction is... well then why are you engaged NOW? and not when you get it? But I think it's different for every couple, and I'm not going to NOT acknowledge it.

    I guess a ring is a big purchase that signifies an investment in that person. To Me. IMHO.

     
    15.
    Member
    1,812 posts
    Buzzing bee
    kjpugs    March 20, 2010   Indianapolis, IN

    DH also made a good point... he liked that the ring told people "I'M TAKEN!"

     
    16.
    Hostess
    8,491 posts
    Bumble
    Beekeeper
    Mrs. DG    July 18, 2009   Seattle/Tahoe

    We were so ringless but so legit :)

    He wanted to make sure I got what I loved, so he popped the question first.  Oh how I miss my rings (I'm swollen up like a giant grapefruit!)

     
    17.
    Hostess
    5,255 posts
    Bee Keeper
    Sulli301    June 26, 2010   Michigan

    I think you kinda need the ring to make it legit...

    it doesn't have to be expensive, or even a ring...if you wanted a necklace or something that would be totally fine...I just think you need SOMETHING or else it is sorta like "We're engaged" and then no follow up or something...maybe that's wrong but...

     
    18.
    Member
    3,096 posts
    Sugar bee
    SanDiegoAli    September 18, 2010   San Diego

    It makes me sad that some people think you need a ring to have a "legit" engagement.  :(

     

    To each their own - as soon as the "will you marry me" comes out of someones mouth and the other person says yes - you are engaged in my book - ring or no ring.

     
    19.
    Member
    1,864 posts
    Buzzing bee
    egb    January 2010  

    Well put and your point of view is interesting.
    I just have a completely different opinions on rings though. I wouldn't have wanted DH to save up to buy a ring for me, for many reasons. Now this is very personal and I know not many share my opinion, but it's just me.

    1) I wouldn't feel safe walking around with something expensive on my finger
    2) I am very, very active, and will never, ever take my rings off, so they will probably scratch - I don't want to feel bad about scratching something expensive
    3) the very active lifestyles makes me look for rings that are flat and won't scratch my baby's face, or get stuck somewhere
    4) I'd rather take all the money and travel together or put it on the house or another project that we may have together.
    5) big rings do not look good on my fingers. at all. I needed something very delicate, and luckily for me, it was less expensive that way

    So, while I get the argument that the time and effort that a man takes to save for a ring shows that he is really committed and takes the engagement seriously. But I think building a life and a future together in a very concrete way is more meaninful of a "legit" engagement.

    I guess it really depends on every couple as well... Some you believe in the engagement w/o ring, and others, you don't.

     
    20.
    Member
    1,068 posts
    Bumble bee
    WendyS328    February 11, 2011   Saint Louis,MO

    Hmm...well here is just my thought

     

    I consider it, semi-legit.  Reason..

    SO and I are constantly talking about marriage, we both agreed that we would want to marry each other.  No ring, no proposal as of yet.

    So right now, I'm not taking it too seriously yet.  I think a lot of couples talk about getting married, but to some couples, that's all it is...just talk.  They never put any action to those words.

     

    So I guess unless he actually got down on one knee and actually asked if I would marry him (w/o a ring), I would consider it an engagement for now.  If it is just talk about being engaged and getting married, then no, I don't consider myself to actually be engaged.

     

     

     
    21.
    Bee Icon
    Bee
    1,524 posts
    Bumble bee
    rainbow    January 1, 2011   Tampa

    Eh, I hate to say it, but IMO I  think you need a ring for it to be legit. I mean, not all rings are expensive so I don't really get the "we're saving up" issue. I'd rather wear a cracker jack ring while I'm waiting for the real thing than to have no ring at all. To me, the ring, no matter how small or large, is a big part of the gesture of the proposal and when someone says "I'm engaged" but has no ring, it might be wrong, but I sort of question the level of commitment/seriousness.

    I never said it was right or polite, but at least I'm being honest!

     
    22.
    Member
    1,812 posts
    Buzzing bee
    kjpugs    March 20, 2010   Indianapolis, IN

    Completely second you Rainbow. I would rather have used my promise ring as an e-ring (or even just a silver band) than have no ring.

     
    23.
    5,478 posts
    Bee Keeper
    lilyfaith    June 23, 2012   Lakeview, Chicago

    To the posters who think a guy is not investing because he doesn't have a ring - I don't see how that applies when he is in the process of saving up? I'm used to those opinions, but it's really bothersome to me because even though it was more of a personal milestone for us, I don't think our engagement was any less real before he had saved up enough for the ring. He knew it'd only take about 4 months or so, why buy an in between ring for that? 

    I also get that some women just don't want engagement rings. It's not even traditional in many countries. 

     
    24.
    3,234 posts
    Sugar bee
    Kittyachi    August 2010   New York

    It's just as legit. Our materialistic culture tells us that a ring makes an engagement "real" and that without one it is somehow not legitimate. My parents didn't get engaged with a ring; FI's parents didn't get engaged with a ring. I didn't have my ring for a few months because we were having it made with a family heirloom stone. I would be beyond offended if anyone had considered my engagement to be somehow "less than" because of that. Just because a guy buys you something expensive, doesn't mean he's actually committed to you. Commitment is something that comes from inside.

    Oh De Beers marketing, you've done SUCH a good job.

     
    25.
    Member
    566 posts
    Busy bee
    Cricket1524    September 4, 2010   Burbank, CA

    Personally as someone who is in fact engaged without a ring I don't think it's anyone's business why we don't have the ring yet or even if we're going to get a ring. What place is it of anyone's to judge that. You NEVER know what someone's circumstances are. In our case its a simple matter of timing if we waited until everyone who is important to us was able to be present again it might be another 2 years (people in law school and overseas and military) and it was simply not a choice either of us were willing to live with so we set a date knowing we may or may not get a ring after the fact. Besides we didn't want to be planning a wedding and not be engaged that seems a bit odd, if you're planning a wedding your engaged simple as that so we just decided ok we have to do things backwards its pretty simple. I don't see why its so bad to not be able to afford it, it's kinda like saying you can't afford it so you don't have the right to get married, personally I'd rather have no ring wear a ratty old dress and marry the person I love with or without money, it's not about the money folks it's about the love and commitment in your heart not the one on your finger.

     
    26.
    Member
    952 posts
    Busy bee
    Nati-Lyte    May 29, 2011   Wedding in Bristol/Newport RI

    This is not meant to be snarky at all, and it's me thinking out loud.   But Everytime I read this reasoning:

     1) I wouldn't feel safe walking around with something expensive on my finger

    I always look at the poster's location.

    Is Ottawa a violent city?

    And again, it's not meant to be snarky, but i've read that reasoning so many times and I'm a little confused by it...like when was the last time someone got mugged solely because of their engagement ring?

    And, egb, all of your other reasons seem reasonable to me. 

     

     
    27.
    Member
    2,217 posts
    Buzzing bee
    monitajb    July 17, 2010   Sacramento

    First, who the heck am I to think an engagement is legit or not? That said, honestly, who the couple was would totally factor into my thinking. If they were 19, I would probably just think it was sweet and figure they are going to have a long engagement. No less "legit," but I wouldn't be asking about china patterns. If they are older and less traditional or same sex, it wouldn't give me a moment of pause. I honestly wasn't sure I wanted an engagement ring, so if a peer of mine came to the conclusion not to get one, I would totally think that is fine. Third option, if I already thought the dude was a scum bag and the girl was letting him walk all over her, I would assume he was just leading her on.

    So, I think those are the assumptions I would make. Legit or not or whatever, I would just keep my trap shut and think my private thoughts.

    EDIT: reading over other posts, there are also a myriad other situations not covered by my examples. Basically, there are plenty of situations where I wouldn't even bat an eye at no ring, and a couple where I would make some assumptions, honestly. But a ring really wouldn't impact the assumptions. A ring with engagement doesn't make the scummy guy any less scummy, for example.

     
    28.
    5,478 posts
    Bee Keeper
    lilyfaith    June 23, 2012   Lakeview, Chicago

    @Nati-Lyte - oh my goodness, on my campus this fall a girl was strong-armed and taken into a van for her jewelry. They tore it off her and dumped her on the street. My university is Lincoln Park, a nice neighborhood in Chicago. I still wear my e ring, but it's a very real problem, unfortunately.

     
    29.
    Member
    1,812 posts
    Buzzing bee
    kjpugs    March 20, 2010   Indianapolis, IN

    Ugh... most of why I didn't want to share my opinion... people being SO OFFENDED that people think it's somehwat less legit... well I'm SO OFFENDED that people have incinuated that it makes me materialistic. I think it's a wonderful tradition and symbol. Like I said, I would have been happy to have just a plain band or even a fake something from a dept. store. We chose to save for a ring since we were able to. It's something I'll treasure for my whole life. But if we hadn't had the money to save I wouldn't have minded doing something in our budget. Him putting that ring on my finger while proposing was something I've dreamed of my whole life. Dreaming of HIM, not the size of the rock.

     
    30.
    Member
    566 posts
    Busy bee
    Cricket1524    September 4, 2010   Burbank, CA

    @lilyfaith my sis lives in Chicago and to be honest I think I'd feel safer walking in parts of downtown LA then those parts of Chicago with jewelry on, you aren't kidding girl . . . but seriously Ottawa?

     
    31.
    Member Icon
    5 posts
    Newbee
    engaged1207    August 14, 2010  

    I do not see any reason why a couple needs something "tangible" to know that they are committed to and love each other.

     
    32.
    5,478 posts
    Bee Keeper
    lilyfaith    June 23, 2012   Lakeview, Chicago

    @Cricket1524 - yeah, unfortunately our crime has been way out of hand these past few years. I haven't had a bad experience myself, but we're looking at not-as-safe neighborhoods right now for our next apartment, and it does make me a bit nervous. 

     
    33.
    Member
    385 posts
    Helper bee
    quirkyparsnip    October 1, 2011   Texas

    I put semi because for my own engagement it wouldn't be legit in my eyes. If it was someone else and they were actively involved in moving forward I wouldn't think of it as unlegit. 

     
    34.
    Hostess
    7,632 posts
    Bumble
    Beekeeper
    MightySapphire      

    I think this is a hotbutton topic and people are afraid to respond lest they offend other users or get flamed for being honest.

     
    35.
    Bee Icon
    Bee
    1,524 posts
    Bumble bee
    rainbow    January 1, 2011   Tampa

    @kjpugs- Yes! Trust me, I really debated whether I should say anything at all, because it's not exactly the "popular opinion" but then I thought- I recall many a thread where members have said that if they don't agree with the "polite" opinion, that they don't say anything at all for fear of being judged/jumped on.

    I'd like to think that I'm a strong/out-spoken enough person to be able to handle speaking on the "unpopular" side of the fence, no matter how many people don't like it. I don't like people being silenced or feeling like they can't share their opinion because it's not the same as everyone else's. Just my little part in trying to change the landscape of "fear on the boards"

    ;)

     
    36.
    Member
    534 posts
    Busy bee
    bridegrl    October 9, 2010   Monterey County, California

    ugh!! I felt the same way, but I just had to get over it...It is legit. It just feels like its not because when you say you're engaged you expect there to be a ring...well, it doesn't always work out that way...It took forever for FI to get me my ring. I think we were engaged for 4 months before we finally picked one out that we both liked. The commitment is what counts to make it official, but it sure makes it super official when you get the ring... :o)

     
    37.
    3,234 posts
    Sugar bee
    Kittyachi    August 2010   New York

    LOL @ "landscape of fear"

    Everyone is entitled to their opinion and so far on this thread no one is calling anyone out for their opinions, just stating their own opinion. I don't see why people are scared to anonymously post their opinion on an internet message board. I'm all for posting unpopular opinions. This is one of those things that people are never going to agree on and that's fine.

     
    38.
    Member
    1,864 posts
    Buzzing bee
    egb    January 2010  

    @Nati-Lyte: Violence can be anywhere. I happen to work in a safe place now, but I was a social worker working in the employment field with people who had no money at all, and tempers so bad that as soon as you learn you're preggers, they put you on "preventive leave" to protect your baby. They wouldn't let us work pregnent in case a client would throw a fit in your office and decide to hit you. I was doing that job, plus it was in a neighbourhood where I could see hard drugs being dealt and used from my office window, and prostitutes who worked during lunch hour...

    So, Ottawa is a very calm city, but you can find anything, anywhere. I was robbed in my car at 2 occasions, and in my office at least once.

    But walking around with thousands of dollars on my finger, I don't feel comfortable in case I broke it or lost it or got it stolen; or the attention...

     
    39.
    Member
    1,068 posts
    Bumble bee
    WendyS328    February 11, 2011   Saint Louis,MO

    WOW....

     

    I don't even know which side of the argument to side with.  I see both points quite clearly, which is why I believe that this is a case by case situation.

     

    There is no text book on this, no right or wrong.  Which is Exactly why some people will be offended either way.

     

    On a side note, by providing a poll and the opportunity to allow the posters to speak out their opinion, it's definatley leaving the door open to having someones' feelings hurt.

     

    @Lilyfaith, in your situation you provided, I don't think your engagement was less legit or memorable than anyone elses's.

     

    @Kjpugs, I completely understand where you are coming from.  I have been dreaming of that day to come as well. 

     
    40.
    5,478 posts
    Bee Keeper
    lilyfaith    June 23, 2012   Lakeview, Chicago

    @rainbow - I really respect your opinion for YOU, I guess I just don't see why it would apply to other people? The ring symbolizes something important to you, but if you knew that one of your best friends didn't feel the same way, would you still see his/her engagement as less legit? I guess I just don't get how it extends beyond personal preference. I think it'd be totally different if the couple themselves wasn't on the same page (i.e., cheap guy) but otherwise I would think it'd be a totally personal matter?

    (Not meant as an attack at all! I'm not offended or anything, more genuinely curious.)

     

    Reply »

    You must log in to post.





    Visit our sister sites eHarmony
    Online Dating
    eHarmony Advice
    Dating Advice
    Project Wedding
    Wedding Songs
    JustMommies
    Pregnancy Calendar
    Copyright 2004-2012, Weddingbee.com
     

    Find your vendors on Weddingbee

    Real reviews from brides in your area!

    Favors by Weddingbee

    • Favors by season

    Shop Now ยป

    Find Registry Find Registry Find Registry

    More
    User Posts Today
    Brielle 44
    ndreighton 36
    vorpalette 29
    caseyleigh10 27
    les105 24
    ellisrobertson 24
    mypinkshoes 23
    fishbone 23
    lionskitty 22
    SouthernGirl 21

    Rings

    User Posts Today
    JustLove25 15
    Brielle 13
    lionskitty 13
    jcent 12
    GelaMac 11
    blkqueen 10
    mylittleviolett 9
    MrsBlueSeptember 8
    Mrs.danish 7
    mypinkshoes 5
    More