(Closed) Flikr v. Smugmug?

posted 10 years ago in Photos/Videos
Post # 3
37 posts
  • Wedding: December 2008

I’ve never used Flikr, but I LOVE smugmug. You have to pay for the service, but I decided it was worth it because it included all the details I was looking for in a photo website. I can mass upload photos (though if you do too many it takes forever), I can just post the website without having to send e-mail invitations to anyone I want to give access too, I can easily put comments on the photos (in bulk even), and so many other features that I love. I just have the basic package which is plenty for my purposes. They are always adding new features too. I can give you the link to my site if you send me a private messge. I hardly use any of the features, so it’s nothing special. I mostly use it as a way to share my pictures with my friends who live all across the country.

Post # 4
158 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: August 2007 - The Wellington House in Fayetteville, NY

I’m totally addicted to Flickr.

Post # 5
134 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: December 2008

Amen to that! I am a Flickr addict, also! Flickr also has great options for putting your photos on just about anything. Also if you are interested in gathering photos from guests, Mrs. Lemon used Flickr for this and gives great instructions here: http://www.weddingbee.com/2007/08/30/collecting-non-pro-photos/

Post # 6
638 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: April 2007

I love me some smugmug too.

I’ve never used Flickr personally – but don’t enjoy viewing others galleries on Flickr – I think it’s a pain.

The topic ‘Flikr v. Smugmug?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors