Post # 1
Hi girls! I need a fresh set of eyes to help me decide between these two gowns. They are both stunning but I’m having a harder time deciding which one looks better on me. I heard that short girls are not suppose to wear ballgowns (and I am 5’1″) so that’s why I am a little nervous purchasing the Justin Alexander 8670 Ballgown! Here are Here are some pics of me in the two dresses (the first two is the Justin alexander dress and the last two is the Allure C200)…
Post # 3
I personally like the first one better, although I’m not sure I could articulate why lol. They are both beautiful!
Post # 5
I LOVE the ballgown on you! Seriously gorgeous!
Post # 7
I like the first one!!!
Create a poll – youll get more answers!
Post # 8
They are both very beautiful on you so I think you can really go either way, but I feel like the first one is perfect! Like the other poster said, I’m not sure why but I prefer the Justin Alexander for you.
Post # 9
The ballgown may be “too big” for a petite woman, but I almost feel like the Allure is too busy.. the beading almost overhwelms you.
Personally, I think the no ballgown rule for petite brides is s bunch of bullhonkey. It’s not impossible to remove a few layers of crinoline if you’re really worried about it.
Post # 10
Honestly, I love both and you look great in both. Something about the sparkle on #2 makes me prefer it a little more.
Post # 12
Both are pretty! I vote for number 2!
Post # 13
Number 1 for me … I love Number 2 too but the neck line seems incomplete but besides that its a TRUE BEAUTY !!!!
Post # 14
I liek the first one better. I think the second dress flares at an awkward point on you.
Post # 16
@MLDoddie: Great Idea! I posted a poll…