If you had these stones to work with, what setting style would you choose?

posted 3 years ago in Rings
Post # 3
Member
108 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: June 2014

What about doing something like this and just using two of the stones in the second ring?

 

Post # 5
Member
4893 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: July 2012

Post # 9
Member
4015 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: October 2013

@lavenderstone:  love GFerg’s idea! That’s beautiful and a great use of the stones!

Post # 10
Member
5483 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: October 2013

@lavenderstone:  There is a bee on here with a heart diamond (dang what is her username???) who used small heirloom diamonds UNDER her ring, like imagine the detail of a verragio. But hers was custom. It looked gorgeous — like a solitaire from the top but had this intricate lace like profile. Boy am I describing this pooly … I will try to look for her.

ETA: Here! I found her. Post #44: http://boards.weddingbee.com/topic/engagement-ring-help-unique-solitaire-pics-please/page/2#axzz2pqdWXeth

 

 

Post # 12
Member
5483 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: October 2013

@lavenderstone:  No problem! I was so proud of myself for finding it hahaha. Good luck!!

Post # 13
Member
560 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: July 1993

I would halo the .50. You might not have enough stones but I doubt it would cost more to buy the ones you need.  If you halo that beauty it will look twice as big.  

Post # 14
Member
379 posts
Helper bee

  GFerg picture is beautiful I love it, it gets my vote!

Post # 16
Member
2262 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: May 2007

@lavenderstone:  I think you should do this, with your princess in the center instead of the round illusion setting it would be so stunning, you’d never get bored of it! lol. 

Leave a comment


Sent weekly. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Find Amazing Vendors