- Blog
- Bios
- Boards
- Classifieds
- DIY
- Gallery
- Vendor Reviews
- Shop Weddingbee
Hey girls,
Two issues here because of this:
The way price works for where I am having the ceremony and reception at is per person attending the RECEPTION, as it includes a 5 course meal or high end buffet with carving stations, etc., open bar for 5 hours, a 1 hour cocktail hour between ceremony and reception with h'oderves, and of course the actual rental space per person. The wedding ceremony has no limit as theres no cost per person for that.
1st. Problem: The number of guests for the reception has already exceeded the maximum amount of guests due to my budget. There are some friends and extended family I WANT to share the beautiful wedding ceremony with, but, am not willing to spend several hundreds of $ on to attend the reception, and go over my budget for. Some of these friends, however, are CLOSER friends with some BMs or some of my closer friends who I will be inviting to both, and they will find out I specifically didn't invite them to the reception. Or if not,the reception area/cocktail hour area after the wedding are a few hundred feet apart (ceremony outside, cocktail hour is outside, and you ended the ballroom from the outside door), they may just follow the rest and invite themself in!!
Is there any etiquette rules on inviting some people to just the wedding ceremony and not the reception? The invitations would just not include the RSVP card for the reception, and not have anything it in that mentions being invited to the reception? Or what should I put on my wedding website to "read your invitations carefully" or what?
2nd problem: Being that we have reached are limit, not everyone can bring a guest. I can't pick certain people who can bring a guest and who can't. The only thing I am thinking to write on the wedding website is that :
"We are sorry to inform you that because we have already exceeded our budget due to the amount of guests attending the reception, we politely ask that UNLESS, you are married, engaged, or the invitation specifies otherwise, you cannot bring a guest with you to the reception."
Or something to that extend.
I know some of my friends may bring their significant other as their guests - they've been with a month, and then after the wedding they break up within a week. I'm sorry but I dont think it's right for me have people at my wedding I barely know because some people felt like "not showing up alone" or whatever the reason may be, when I'm ALREADY over budget.However, they can bring a guest to the wedding ceremony! I don't know how to do this?
Should I write that? And then for those who are cannot bring a guest put in their RSVP card already: "NUMBER OF PEOPLE ATTENDING WEDDING CEREMONY " and then "NUMBER OF PEOPLE ATTENDING WEDDING RECEPTION 1 "?
What's proper? Suggestions?
Hmm. I think that etiquette dictates that everyone you invite to the ceremony you invite to the wedding, especially since they are at the same location. Would you be able to trim the number of people you invite to the ceremony so that everyone who is invited can go to the reception as well. I personally wouldn't put anything on a wedding website about "exceeding budget due to number of guests invited." If you do, you will likely run into issues such as people trying to pay for another guest to come, and that's just awkward.
Maybe some other people have more specific advice though. Good luck!
As far as ettiquette goes, whoever is invited to the ceremony, should also be invited to the reception.
IMHO, I would think that :
"We are sorry to inform you that because we have already exceeded our budget due to the amount of guests attending the reception, we politely ask that UNLESS, you are married, engaged, or the invitation specifies otherwise, you cannot bring a guest with you to the reception."
would be a little tacky.
Why don't you try addressing your RSVP cards like this...
Miss Jane Doe
__ able to attent
__ unable to attend
__ out of 1 guest able to attend
Miss Jane Doe and Guest
__ able to attend
__ unable to attend
__ out of 2 guests able to attend
Hope that helps!
I read about this scenario in "Miss Manner's Guide to a More Dignified Wedding". She states that it is bad manners to invite people to the ceremony but not to the reception. If you are not going to invite them to the reception, then don't invite them at all.
I think the rationale was that it's conflicting for guests to be invited to see the ceremony, but not get to enjoy the celebration (and may also imply that you are just inviting them for a gift, even though they don't get any of the reception fun).
Please, please don't write that on your website. No matter your intentions, I think it will just send the wrong message, and make your wedding seem as though it's about rules and money, when it's really about celebrating your marriage. Also, as far as your budget is concerned, you should never feel like you owe anyone an explanation for that.
As far as the ceremony/reception problem, I don't see how you can get around that without other people knowing. They are in the same place and also, some of them are friends with some of the bridal party and not others... they will find out and be miffed.
What really jumped out at me was your comment about how some of your guests are worth spending money on at the reception and some are not. As long as you feel this way, I think you will have problems. Either they are worth it to you or they are not. We cannot use the price per head at a reception as a value judgement on the people in our lives.
Your wedding is a year away. It's hard, I know, but I think you will have to just cut your guest list and give ALL your guests the full experience of your wedding day, as opposed to having some of your guests experience it more than others.
I agree with other posters that it is a bad idea to invite guests to only the reception. If I were a guest, I'd actually feel some combination of confused and insulted by the end of the wedding. Confused because I would likely initially assume that you simply forgot to add a reception card to my invite (and mistakes happen). However, once I found out that other people were invited to a reception and I was not, I'd feel a bit insulted that I didn't make the cut. It would certainly strain the friendship if a friend did this to me.
I can understand the desire to share with everyone, but it might be better to simply share photos with the people you cannot invite after the date. And for guests, including only the names of the people who are invited on the invites may help to spell out exactly who is invited.
Please please please reconsider how many people you are inviting to the wedding. You shouldn't feel obligated to invite everyone that you get along with/are related to to your wedding (that is what having a second reception is for). While the wedding may be about you and your FI getting married, your guests should feel like you truly want them to be there. The only case that I can see it being appropriate to only invite a guest to the ceremony only is if you have super elderly people that would rather go home than attend your reception. However, I'm assuming that there may be only a few guests that meet that criteria. I think that it is reasonable to invite your friends that are not in committed relationships without a plus one ONLY if there is a reasonable amount of friends in that situation who already get along. Besides, the ceremony is about the two of you while the reception is a way to thank your guests for spending that special time with you. I say leave out the friends who are closer to the BM's or your closest friends than they are to you, and to do some serious guest list trimming.
It is really rude to invite guests to the ceremony any not the reception. It makes people feel like they're second class guests (because that's essentially what they are in this situation) and potentially second class friends. And since you're having a fairly elaborate reception, I can guarantee that people will not be forgiving when they find out that you invited them to the ceremony (thus causing them to potentially travel, buy a dress, and buy you a gift) and you didn't invite them to the reception to thank them for attending. That will come across as really greedy. Especially since all the non-invited ceremony guests will be able to see the reception area, but not enter. I don't say this to be mean, but to warn you before you do anything that may cause the end of some of your friendships.
You basically have two options- don't invite these people at all (which is fine, they will be far less offended by not receiving an invitation at all, than they will be if you invite them only to the ceremony and make then a "second class guest"). Or you can cut back somewhere and invite them to the whole thing. Do you really need five courses? Could you do a beer and wine only bar, instead of a full open bar? Or limit the bar to 3 hours instead of 5? Or cut back your decorations, etc. There are a million ways to save money that aren't offensive to your guests.
As to people wanting to bring dates- the etiquette rule is that only people in "social units"- people who are married, engaged, or living together (romantically, not as roommates) must be invited together. You don't have to give everyone a plus one or invite your friend's flavor of the month. But you also don't have to write anything on the website about it. When you go to address you invites or save the dates, just write "Ms. Jane Smith" and leave her short-term boyfriend (or whoever) off. If she asks, just say "unfortunately due to space restrictions, we can't give people guests. We're very sorry." And leave it at that. Don't tell people to bring their guests to the ceremony and try to get them to leave before the reception- that's just asking for trouble. You also don't need to include any kind of note on the website, because the assumption should be that unless a guest is specifically invited by name, they are not invited.
Again, I don't mean to sound harsh, but what your suggesting will offend a lot of people, and better you hear it from us now than figuring it out after the fact when your friends all get mad at you...
I guess I should have mentioned this in the 1st message. My guest list has been cut back by over 350 people. My mother is Italian, my dad is Jewish, and my fiance is Greek, thus, our imidiate families alone are all HUGE with a half in the states, half in Europe! I don't mean family like the 3rd cousins I've never met type member because my family in the states are super close! I see 26 1st cousin's on my mother's side on a monthly basis, not to mention my each aunt and each uncle! I mean, we already had to cut some IMMEDIATE FAMILY (less close with, and aren't local).
Put it this way, if I were to invite all immediate members of each family.. I'd have over 500 guests. And as families gossip, I know that the ones who are not going to get invited to at LEAST the ceremony are going to start a family war! My cousin sent out invitations to 1 of my aunt's and for some reason she didn't get it in the mail.. and althought it was a MISTAKE- it has started a family feud that's gone on for over 12 years!
I cannot change my venue, my father (who is paying for this) already picked and put down the deposited on the place (which was the place I mentioned I loved).. and yeah I can change the menu, but I've calculated it, and I will to able to invite 3 more people by doing that, I mean the price per person ranges from the cheapest- most expensive by only $18, and open bar is INCLUDED. I've tried cutting prices every where- all my vendors I've gone through friends and gotten REALLY good deals, my dress was on clearence, did my own STD, probably doing my own centerpieces, my MOH is a florist and doing flowers for cost of materials!
Cutting even more people is a NO NO, changing venue can't be done, cutting prices I've done, and even if I didn't have a photographer, dress, flowers, etc. I still wouldn't have enough money in my budget to invite every one to wedding + reception.
I am not saying that there is a price tag on a person, but if I invite one family member who is married, I MUST also invite that family members in-laws too, so its not like that 1 person is worth the per person cost, but I need to evaluate and think "if I invite aunt Mary Ella&her husband she will want to bring his kids, his step kids, her kids, and her husbands and exhusbands-in laws (NO JOKE) which is an extra 15 people, but aunt jane and uncle joe will only bring their 2 kids."
I'll get grief for not inviting some of my family members at all- at least to the ceremony. And they know its not about any gift, because its in our cultures to send a gift if you KNOW about a wedding, even if your not invited.
And yes, because the families are SO big, we are having another smaller wedding in Europe, so my family members from Italy and my FI family from Greece can attend in summer 2012 (which is MUCH cheaper than a US wedding).
I am trying to please everyone, but its a lose lose situation for me. Heck, even my immediate family, i have 4 brothers and 3 sisters (all OLDER AND MARRIED)! HA! And my bridal party has 10 girls, which i narrowed down BIG TIME!
So maybe it's not about etiquette... i just need someone to HELP ME figure this out!! Anyone have this kind of family problem, or an extremely large families like this?
Thanks for all of the suggestions about how i can make sure it is clear to those who cannot bring a guest with them.
One thing that jumps out at me is the problem you mentioned where if you invite one relative, you must also invite their inlaws, children, their children, etc. This is not true. In my family, in some cases we are limited the guests invited to a certain generation of family and not their children because of similar issues. I think people understand that this kind of thing comes up in figuring out who can be invited, because there are always space constraints if not financial!
The solution is absolutely not to invite some people to the ceremony and not to the wedding. This is a recipe for offense and disaster. Cutting the guest list is hard but it sounds like the only solution, given what else you've stated. Perhaps you could send a "wedding announcement" to those other guests on/after the wedding date? I've come across that as a potentially appropriate thing to do.
Like PP, I would just urge you to put yourself in the position of your guests. How would you feel if you got an invitation, bought a present showed up at the ceremony and then were told that you were actually a tier-2 friend that didn't get dinner?
I also have a reception venue that is very small. I can't tell you the pain we went through to cut down our guest list. But honestly? I'm now super excited about those who are coming. They are truly my closest friends and family and I can't wait to share my day with those people. There are people that 3 months ago I agonized over whether to put them on the guest list and now I don't even see some of those people frequently--they really didn't ever need to be on my list.
Good luck with everything =)
I think that since you say you are so close with a lot of your family members, perhaps you could speak with them one on one and explain your situation? That way, it comes across as more gentle and as a "personal request" than a blanket policy. I think they will be more forgiving and understanding that way.
If you are worried about people just walking into the reception uninvited, then perhaps you could include "tickets to the reception" in the invites of those who are invited to it, and not in the others and have them taken at the door. They could also have seating info on them or something practical like that.
Good luck with your problem, I know what you mean about big families...
Holy cow, how the hell are you gonna solve this one!! How about if you go the european way on the gifts, don't do a registry, and get your mom/aunts/ family you're close to, to tell anyone who asks, that
''cash gifts are fine, don't put yourself to the bother of buying gifts?''
That's pretty much what happens here, and very few guests bring gifts any more. You just get a heap of cards with approx 100 euro in them (usually per couple).
Is it possible to leave out kids that you're not blood related to?! Aunt whatever her name is's stepkids, for example? Particularly if they're over 16, say.
Best of luck with it!
@aunt pol : funny you say that, we are so going the European way and not registering anywhere, but rather have a wedding wish well there! But it doesn't matter, they all know to bring an envelop.
@berry: i can tell my great aunts, and aunts a MILLION times that the invitation to the wedding is ONLY inviting her and her husband, but try convincing that to a 84 year old who's been bringing the same people to the family weddings my entire life. They are all set in their ways, and have selective hearing! SO STUBBORN!
Also my wedding is Aug. 23,2011 i don't know why someone say it as the 2nd, but that just happenes to be the day before Easter Sunday- BIG HOLIDAY for Greeks and Italians!! Greeks actually fast the day before (day of wedding), and some Italians do too... so maybe they won't come to the wedding due to that!!
But any suggestions come to mind now that you know its a holiday weekend wedding?
ok first take a deeeep deeep breath.
i have a family that is similar to yours - i have 18 aunts and uncles, including spouces thats 36, including 1st cousins tack on about 84 on last count, include my step sisters kids, thats another 15, if i were to branch out to 2nd cousins, the number would baloon to about 200+. so i feel your pain on the huge big family.
as for the wedding. you need to put your foot down somewhere. it sounds like either you have a limited number at your wedding and can afford it by cutting from the guest list, OR you invite everyone and you choose a different cheaper venue.
personally, i chose the first of those choices.
i limited my guest list to only aunts and uncles (NO children). everyone who was on the list was only invited with their SO if they were married, engaged or life partners. i only inivted two of my first cousins, partially because i am closer to them than any of the other cousins.
using that, i cut that insane number from earlier down to 66 people on my invitation list.
you have to make tough choices. if you arent prepared to make those tough choices, then start shopping for a cheaper venue.
but you CANNOT only invite people to the ceremony and not feed them. its bad form and just wrong to do. if you cant afford to have them at the reception simply dont invite them.
people will understand. and if they are family, they will eventually GET OVER IT. hey its part of being family.
wedding planning and marriage consists of having to make hard choices and this is one of the first ones! :)
so my suggestion is look at your budget first, see what you can afford and STICK TO THAT. come hell or high water. make rules for it that way no one thinks you are "playing favorites" its money period.
people will understand.
oh and your profile says your wedding is April 2nd not August 23rd (its by your name on your postings)
thanks, I changed the date! Don't know how that happened.
Scarey thing is my fiance and I started to count our family members (CLOSE ONES, didn't go past 2nd cousins).. and we stoped at 750!! So i think narrorw it down to 100 is pretty good, but my family hold grudges for YEARS. I mean 12 years for a mistake.. and its FAMILY WARS not just my aunt being mad at my cousin, its 1 family vs. another family.
I know what I want, and who I want.. so I can make this VERY difficult decision. However, my family is going to make me feel guilty and horrible about it for YEARS. I would rather not show up myself!
who's paying for it? whomever writes the check gets the final say on the guest count.
and honestly if family members are gonna be that petty about something like this, then good riddance. family should be more forgiving than that.
shame on them! not to mention you dont have to deal with negative comments. THEY arent paying for it are they???
invite who you want and the rest be damned.
now if everyone you truly honestly totally cant live without being there is over your limit for your budget, then seriously rethink where you are getting married and pick somewhere else. its not worth the heartache of having to cut people you actually would WANT there.
Do you really think people care that much to come to your ceremony? Id rather not be invited to the ceremony. Id be pretty offended if I was invited to the ceremony and then told I wasnt good enough to be invited to the reception. I seriously doubt people care that much about being invited to your ceremony. Invite who ever to both the ceremony and the reception, if they only make your list to come to the ceremony, dont invite them at all.
I don't really have any good advice. Maybe one of your cousins has dealt with something like this before and can help? I just wanted to with you good luck! I hope everything turns out well in the end.
You can't hold yourself responsible for meeting the expectations of unreasonable people. These people are all in the same family as you. They know how big the family is. They likely had to deal with this same situation at their weddings, or their children's weddings. You want your wedding to be a day where you are surrounded by the people who love you, and if someone is willing to say "if you don't invite my second cousin's dogwalker, then I'll never speak to you again for the rest of my life!" then they are not showing you love, ,are not a reasonable person, and are not a person that you need to bend over backwards to accommodate.
First thing I would do is forget that in-laws thing. Invite the people you are related to, and stop there. So, invite your blood aunt and her husband your uncle, but not your aunt's husband's family. You are not related to those people and you do not need to invite them.
What do your mother and father say about all this? Your parents must know the size of the venue, and they've been dealing with this family for longer than you have. Could it be that you are assuming that people need to be invited who they don't necessarily think would need to be?
Also, the sides don't need to have the same "rules" if your families are different. For instance, I'm very close with my first cousins. My Fi hardly knows his first cousins' names. So we're inviting mine but not his.
I don't car ehow big your family is, where they are from, how long they hold grudges, or who is footing the bill.
If they are invited to the ceremony, you MUST invite them to the reception. It is incredibly bad taste to only invite a gues to the ceremony and not the celebration afterwards. In the end, it will only make you look like a poor host who is more concerned with having an elaborate event than the feelings of your guests.
Put the names of only who is invited to the ceremony and reception on the envelope. They will understand that those parties are the ones who are invited to both events. There is NO WAY you can tell them "Oh you can bring a guest to my ceremony but you need to ditch them before the reception". I almost hope you were kidding about that. Please don't do that.
Bottom line: everyone invited to the ceremony must be invited to the reception. Period. Find a way to make it work, or downsize your wedding and have some hurt feelings.
How many of these guest would be children? What if you stated ADULT RECEPTION only on the invitations? Would that help at all? All the different parts of the families would still be represented, but you could tell everyone you are having a very elegant ADULT affair. I think people would understand that.
If you're going the European way of not registering, why don't you consider the European way of handling receptions?
I can't say if this is how other countries do it, but in the Netherlands doing a reception where there's a dinner that all the guests can come to is NOT typical (everyone is shocked I'm doing this LOL). They generally do a cake/punch or horderve reception and then the wedding party and those closest to the bride/groom go for the expensive 5-7 course dinner.
All of the weddings I've been to except for one, the reception and dinner were at the same venue but held in different areas. After the 1-2 hour reception, we slipped off with the rest of the wedding party for dinner and the people still at the reception gradually went off home or out to dinner themselves. Maybe you can talk to the venue for something like this??
Thanks to everyone with the suggestions. All my personal friends who are not realtives are invited to both, and those married and or engaged will be allowed to bring their spouse. I can write adult reception, and the place does offer a babysitting service, so they won't be far from their kids.... but who's suppose to pay for that? And I know a LOT of my family will completely ignore this!
And the main reason why I asked about my guests being able to bring a guest to the ceremony but not the reception is because 6 of my bridesmaids and several of my friends have asked me if they can bring their boyfriend or girlfriend,(these are the bf and gf I haven't even met), and I told them that due to space and guest limit they cannot. And THEY were the ones that said "Oh, can they come to the wedding ceremony with me, I'd love them to witness the wedding, but I can use a night away from my gf/bf for the reception" or my BM said "I just want my bf to see me in the wedding, no need for them to come to the reception, you don't even know my new boyfriend." SO THEY ACTUALLY SUGGESTED THEY WANTED THEIR GUEST TO COME TO THE WEDDING CEREMONY VS. THE RECEPTION!! It was NEVER my suggestion nor would i have thought about it.
@texaslawgirl: I appreciate your opinion, but you DID NOT read what I wrote and I encourage you to do that before you start to say things, in a very rude, almost like I'm personally offending YOU. You said to "downsize my wedding".. umm, I have from y guest list has been cut back by over 350 people, I can only have 100 people at the reception! I have cut out college roommates, some of my volleyball and basketball team members I've known since middle school. You are taking this a little too personally too. I mean to say: "I don't car ehow big your family is, where they are from, how long they hold grudges, or who is footing the bill If they are invited to the ceremony, you MUST invite them to the reception." You also didn't read that my relatives will be MORE offended that they are NOT invited to any part of the wedding then to be invited to just the wedding and not the reception!! Plus, I figured that since most of them are 65+ (I'm guessing you didn't read the part that they are older, set in their ways, and are STUBBORN). Which would you invite a 74 year old couple to, thats family and will get offended if they aren't invited at all and they are usually in bed by 9pm and my reception doesn't start until 745?? Going by your MUST DO, I'll invite them to the reception, and they might only stay 30mins and call it a night...doesn't make sense to me!
"They will understand that those parties are the ones who are invited to both events. There is NO WAY you can tell them "Oh you can bring a guest to my ceremony but you need to ditch them before the reception". I almost hope you were kidding about that." In response to that comment.. read the aboveBefore giving advise on being a "good host" learn how to give someone advise with TACT.
Thank you.
@splatt
What I'm saying is there is no *tactful* way to not invite your guests to your reception if you are inviting them to your ceremony. Perhaps you should have thought about this issue before planning a wedding with such high costs. I appreciate that your wedding is expensive, your family is large, etc., but there are going to be some seriously hurt feelings if you exclude people from the part of your evening that is supposed to be their "Thank You" for coming.
You asked for opinions, but obviously are only wanting to hear what will work with your current ideas. My opinion is that there is no tactful/polite/inoffensive way to do it.
Ok so I had the same problem, only my reception is not at the same venue as my ceremony so what we have done is only invited out out of town guest (family) wedding party and some friends to the reception. I just wanted to tell you that this is your day and you have to do what is in your best intrest it's your money and only you know your budget. So do you. If they are really your friends they will understand or eventually get over it. If not think of it this way how often do you see this people? Do they call on a regular? These were some of the deciding factors that we used when choosing our guest list for the reception. Hope it helped a little for you and remember this day is about you and your future hubby no one else!!!
@texas - Its not that I want to hear what I want to hear.. but I've read that over and over again about the 'etiquette" now i'm searching for SUGGESTION/SOLUTION!
I did have my venue/costs due to my family,very much in mind ,the minute the ring was put on my finger! It just so happens that my dad "takes care of everything", and is paying for the entire wedding here AND the entire wedding I am having in Europe (being that i have no $ i just started working a week ago). He knows how big our side of the family is, but didn't realized how big my fiance's side was, that lived in the states, he thought there was just a handful here and the rest were in Greece. Which is true, there are about 125-150 family members in states (includ. 1st cousin, aunt, uncle, Godfather&mother, etc. not distant realtives..those by the way are all my dad had accounted for) and just over 250 in Greece. So there was a miscommunication about that.
The venue I did NOT pick out, yes, I did go to it with my parents- 1st one I looked & my dad is a VERY loyal Marriott cutomer, and this one just happened to be SPECTACULAR, but on the middle to high end $ wise, and I loved it.. (my father could tell, i didnt say "this is it" or anything). We went to about 8 other venus ranging from all different $ ranges, two of which I liked and said that, but my dad said "But doesn't compared to Marriott, dont u think?" (in casual convo.) and i said "NO! Not at all... but is VERY dueable" (my dad just heard the "No! not at all part). Being that I'm his only daughter, and youngest.. he goes to me one evening that he wanted to go to the Marriott by himself, my fiance could only come with because he wanted to talk "a lil business"- which is classic for him. Well, about 2 hours after his meeting he calls me and goes "you are going to be so happy!! I booked it, got the date u wanted, put down the deposit and they are sending me over a contract!!!". WOW. I was appreciateive but a little upset bc I thought WE were going to make a decision. How can i complain though?However, my father... who has only had to pay for the Groom's responsiblites for a wedding didn't realize the $ of a wedding AT ALL!!! He didn't add or take into account the $ INCLUDING SERVICE FEES and TAX FEES which are over 28%!!! Adding another $25,000 to just the venue!!! This is where I got mad and said, "dad i love that u did this, but u know the budget u gave me..I didn't account for that extra $25,000 in my budget.. if i knew it was that much i would have told u not to even consider it!" and his response "it is what it is hunny... i didn't know either but YOU gotta figure this out".... A lot of family will have to come to the wedding but not the reception! However, with everything else with the wedding i CUT BACK!! Gone with friends of friends for vendors- picked a dress I "liked-loved" on clearence from over $7000 but was $551 ! I mean so far I've saved a lot just by doing all of that.. but not enough
WHAT DOES EVERYTHING, INCLUDING U TEXAS (USEEM TO HAVE ETIQUETTE DOWN) So what do u think about having a small celebration before the wedding where I INVITE everyone that would only be invited to the ceremony, give them the same favors i'm giving my guest, but at a place more affordable and has the space to accommadate them? Thats my only other solution to this, because they ALL have to be invited to the wedding... like i said if they don't get an invite to either they will think its less tactful/polite/and offensive than not getting invited to ONE, especially since most are older and the reception is a bit late for them?? BTW, the being invited to wedding and not reception is STRICTLY for family members, not my personal friends. What do u and every one else thing abotu this?????
Do NOT write that! Not only are you airing your dirty laundry to the world but you are insulting your guests! Even though I personally consider this option tacky, the only way you can invite people to one event and not the other is if you invite only a few to the ceremony and ALL to the reception. What you are doing is rude and it says to your guests, "come to my wedding and buy me a gift but you're not important enough for me to buy you dinner." Don't have a fancy five-course meal and carving station! Do something more simple.... Please do not do what you are proposing.... you will inevitably insult your guests....
Gosh you are in such a tough situation! I feel bad for you because it sounds like no matter what you do you are bound to make a few folks unhappy. I am a believer and follower of most "wedding etiquette" but at the same time I think that there are situations in which it can be bended! I mean come on, what’s really going to happen if you don’t follow the “rules”? People are going to look down on you? Then they are petty. It sounds to me like you are not trying to be rude but you are more concerned with keeping the peace among your family. I do suggest, however, that you do not write on your website. Maybe try to handle it on the rsvp card. This is what I wrote on mine or will be writing:
We have reserved ___ seat(s) in your honor
________________________________________________
___Accept(s) with pleasure
___Decline(s) with regrets
And write in the number so people know they can’t bring 5 extra folks. Unfortunately, there are people who ignore this! I really like your idea about the pre-ceremony celebration and I say if your friends ask to bring their gf/bf to the ceremony only then that’s ok because they asked you. Also, your dad is paying for the entire wedding right? Is there anyway FI’s parent’s can pitch in some since there side of the family is so large, as well?
If you must absolutely invite everyone I would ditch your reception space. I know you said your dad took care of it, but um, it doesn't fit everyone. Ditch it. Get a large hall and if your budget doesn't allow for a full dinner for that many people, do a dessert and punch reception.
I'm sorry but in this case you really do have to host everyone who comes to the ceremony.
The only choices here are cutting the guest list or getting a different reception space. I see nothing else.
Wow. Okay, first of all I 100% agree with Oyster. There is no way some people won't find out that they were only invited to the ceremony and it will hurt their feelings, no matter what excuse you use to justify it. And PLEASE don't write that on your website!! In fact, don't ever mention the guest list or money to anyone outside of people who are contributing financially. I'm sure you will individually assess every guest's situation before deciding if they get a plus-one, so as others have pointed out you can write that on their individual RSVP cards. For parents with children who aren't invited, I would send them a mass email reminding them that the day is adults-only, but childcare is available nearby, contact X if you want to set it up or discuss prices. That's all you have to do.
Second, you are going to have to cut back on your guest list. There is no way around it. Honestly, the only thing I can think of (which will still hurt feelings) would be to have your ceremony in the AM then the reception much later in the evening so it isn't AS obvious with people walking from the ceremony into the reception area. But even wiht this option people will find out and be hurt. You don't want that.
Third, I won't jump on the bandwagon of coming down on you, because honestly you said out loud (in writing) what most of us are feeling. Let's be honest girls, we've all fantisized about cutting certain people off the guest list or communicating a message like that about plus-one's. The hard part is doing it tactfully and luckily we can learn from each other how to do it right.
Just realize, @Splatt, that if you write that on your website you will be ridiculed and if you invite some people to the ceremony only, you will be accused of being greedy by looking for more presents without paying for their plate.
I agree with ribbons - is there any way you get get a different place for the reception?
I agree with Ribbons. At this point it seems like if you want to have all these people you will have to switch venues. Even if you lose the deposit, by finding a bigger venue and doing a reception that is cocktails and hors d'oevres or something less involved than your high-end five course meal with open bar, you will still save money and prevent offending your guests.
You have too many guests for this room. You are unwilling to cut the guest list. Therefore you must change the room. It's just that simple. Plus, changing the room has the added benefit of allowing you to get your food, drink, and venue budget back under control.
It's time to have a frank discussion with your father about this. He obviously knows it's a problem, but because he doesn't have the answer he's putting it off on you. Well, he told you to figure it out, so go back to him and tell him you have the answer- you must change the venue or change the guest list. There is no way to keep both.
The situation sucks, but it is what it is. Sometimes there aren't perfect solutions which allow us to have everything we want.
Because your Dad handled signing the contract for the venue and he is paying for the event, I think it would be beneficial to sit down and have an honest straight-forward discussion with him. Can you create an Excel sheet that goes over all the anticipated costs for the wedding that he has agreed to pay for and show how much it costs per person? I would include everything- food, cake, gratuity, taxes etc. etc. It sounds like you are having a rather large event (guessing based on the fact that the service fees and taxes for the venue will equal about $25,000).
If he is unwilling to discuss this with you, would you consider having an event that you and your fiance pay for? Unfortunately a lot of times whoever pays gets a lot of the say. The event probably wouldn't be as lavish, but you could invite who you wanted and it would be you and your FI's event - not your parent's event. For me, part of the engagement time was to help distance myself from relying on my parents and start making decisions with my future husband.
Another option would be to have your dad contribute as he is and then you and your FI pay the difference between what your dad is contributing and the final cost of the event.
Was your dad aware of the guest list situation when you guys picked the venue? If so, it doesn't really make sense that he would think that venue would work...what does he think about cutting off some family members from the guest list? Would you lose the deposit you put down if you decide to change venues?
Oh man this is a doozy. You either have to cut your guest list or find another reception venue. Either make your family mad by not inviting them, or make your Dad mad by wasting his deposit money. Tough choices!! But it just didn't make sense to book a reception venue that does not accomodate your guests when you are obligated to have such a large wedding. Soo... I kinda think he has to suck it up! Or you can just have the smaller wedding at the venue you've booked, but I understand that creates family problems.
Would you still be way over on the guest count if you didn't let any of your guests bring a +1 (unless they are married, in which case the spouse would be a guest). That might be a place to start on cutting down your guest list.
Another option might be to have a separate, cheaper reception on a different day and invite a chunk of family/friends that you're obligated to invite to that one only. The trick here is that you would NOT be able to invite these people to the ceremony. (Like others have said, anyone invited to the ceremony has to be invited to the reception that follows.) But this could be an option for including more members of your family in the celebration of your marriage, even though they aren't invited to the ceremony. You could even send out a marriage announcement to these people, along with an invitation to the second reception.
I know you are looking for solutions, but inviting some people to the ceremony and not to the reception is simply not a viable solution. Trust me, it will be a disaster. Especially since they are at the same location!!! People won't understand and will jsut show up anyway.
And I agree with others that you should refrain from putting ANYTHING about your budget on your wedding website. Invitations and RSVP cards should indicate whether or not a guest can bring a +1, and any & all people at the ceremony need to be invited to the wedding reception (including the +1's, obviously)
here is a possible solution - this is what my sister did. less because of guest list numbers but more because we wanted alcohol at the wedding and she was inviting a TON of church folk who dont agree with imbibing and really didnt want them to be offended (read really old baptist elders 60+)
we had TWO receptions.
one reception was immediately following the church ceremony on site, we hired a caterer that made a nice quick church-like buffet style dinner (it was chicken, two sides, salad and cake) with of course just sweet tea and water for drinks no alcohol.
the bridal party was there and we had our 100+ church family there. we at a few bites, went around to tables to say hi and take pictures and were out of there in a bout an hour (which is how much the older folks would last anyway) no music or dancing (not allowed in the church anyway) just simple decorations. The whole reception for the church folk was about $2000 (for the catered food).
after that we went to the larger family and friends reception where it was at a local restaurant for about 250. we had an open bar, and spent the rest of the night there (during the time that we were at the other reception it was "Cocktail hour" at the larger alcohol included reception.
dunno if you are marrying in the church but if you are, look into if they have space at the ceremony cite for a small reception for the older relatives. if you have as many folks who are that old who will be in attendance, this might be a welcome solution.
so maybe two receptions??
You must log in to post.
| Visit our sister sites | eHarmony Online Dating |
eHarmony Advice Dating Advice |
Project Wedding Wedding Songs |
JustMommies Pregnancy Calendar |

| User | Posts Today |
|---|---|
| Lyndzo | 52 |
| Brielle | 41 |
| mypinkshoes | 34 |
| Cady | 32 |
| AshleyR83 | 30 |
| fivemonthsnotice | 28 |
| ndreighton | 27 |
| rebwana | 26 |
| funkymunky85 | 26 |
| fishbone | 26 |
| User | Posts Today |
|---|---|
| violet25 | 11 |
| Brielle | 6 |
| Steph18 | 4 |
| Cady | 4 |
| KatyElle | 3 |
| jpmorgan | 3 |
| AshleyR83 | 3 |
| jules28 | 3 |
| teabiscuit | 3 |
| This Time Round | 3 |