- Blog
- Bios
- Boards
- Classifieds
- DIY
- Gallery
- Vendor Reviews
- Shop Weddingbee
I suppose it is sad that our society is at a point where it is necessary - but I do think it is necessary. My family is really into hunting and my Dad owns a lot of guns, but he doesn't have any problem with obtaining the permits because he isn't going to do anything illegal or dangerous with them...it may be an annoyance but so is getting a driver's license...
I don't think it's a contradiction because the goverment also has the right to regulate these types of things for the public welfare.
This to me is on the same lines of "free speech". A lot of people have this conception that the right to free speech means they can say whatever they want whenever they want, and that simply isn't the case. There are also limitations on this, and rightfully so.
i dont think in pa you need a permit to buy them. in vermont you can buy and carry w/o a permit. it varies by state.
I think it's important to have both.. I mean, anybody can buy a car if you have the money, but you have to learn how to drive it before getting out on the roads. These things can be useful, but also very dangerous. While I'm not a fan of guns, I don't have a problem with people safely owning them. But I wouldn't feel this way if any yahoo could buy one, that's for sure.
ditto troubled, i think the law varies by state... and for those states that do have it, MI included, i think it's more of a safety precaution that i can appreciate. FI took the one day class and he said he learned so much and was glad that he took it.
i guess you're right that it's an oxymoron... but i feel a lil safer knowing that ppl in my state needed a permit before purchasing a gun.
I get what you're saying. We're supposed to have the right to bear arms to protect ourselves from the government (really), but the government tells us in what way we can exercise that right.
Here's my opinion... which i realize is wildly unpopular with 98% of americans so i generally keep it to myself but whatevs... just my opinion:
I don't really care what the constitution/bill of rights/declaration of independence says. At all. Those documents were written HUNDREDS of years ago by a very select (read: non-diverse) group of men in an entirely different world. Things are different now. The world is different. Why should we believe that they had some divine power to know what was right for an entire country of people FOREVER regardless of how the world changed? It just makes absolutely no sense to me to say that something is appropriate because it is the status quo. I think they did a great job designing the laws for the time they lived in, but it bugs me that now, so long into the future, the end-all/be-all discussion is "Is it constitutional." I think the conversation should be "what is appropriate NOW"
I realize that throwing out the constitution and starting over would open up a whole can of worms and i don't have a good solution for it... but that those are just my feelings. The bill of rights are not the ten commandments. They are not divine.
Guns are dangerous and we live in a crowded and angry country sometimes. We need control for the safety of citizens. I don't really care what the bill of rights says.
There is always a line between paternalism and anarchy, but I think that too veer to far towards one or the other would be detrimental to the greater good.
I just find it funny that we regulate this and yet we have millions of criminals on the streets with weapons they don't have permits for.
I agree, I have no problem getting a permit for any weapon I buy, or the hubs for that matter. We know why we have them and we aren't using them for anything illegal. Like I said, I get the reasons.
HA! And on the subject of drivers' licenses...Where are people getting them these days? No joke, the other day a guy turned on his left signal and turned right, then at the next turn he did the same thing. REALLY?! I don't get it. (think Homer Simpson) DOH!
@corgi - haha, i agree with you. I want to scream sometimes - i mean, the crazy down the block that pulled a shotgun on the tow truck that was taking his car b/c he parked it on a handicapped ramp does NOT need a gun. The government is never going to come knocking on his door. Maybe the police, since he's a little wild. But there are so many crazies out there that BARELY disguise that they'd like to bear arms on the government. Next weekend / Monday April 19 will be a very interesting day to watch the news. I am so sick of seeing my "patriotic" fellow americans calling our highest officials communists, criminals, hitler, and bringing guns to public events - who's causing the terror here?
That SAID - if someone wants to own a gun in the country somewhere and can handle it responsibly - whatever. Just be safe, and keep it at home, ya know?
So prob the majority of people own a gun in pa, at least those not in cities, but i'm torn on the issue. My sister goes to vtech and was there when the shootings happened. The guy who did it had a history of mental problems but could buy several guns. I donno, there's going to be a black market no matter how you regulate it though so maybe crazies will always have access.
I'm a republican, but I think Bill Clinton was a genius to make it illegal for the public to carry semi-automatic assault weapons. It's one thing to excersize your right to bear arms to protect yourself, but seriously do you need an AK-47 to stop an intruder?
And I'm glad people have to carry a permit in order to own and use weapons. The 'right to bear arms' was designed back in the day when it was custom for people to grow up being taught how to use and respect weapons, nowadays not so much.
@modern - I like that though u and I probably disagree on most topics (i remember a few from other threads), I can see that we both come to a moderate conclusion in these discussions! Love differning points of view. I feel like forwarding my state senators the Weddingbee link, haha. This is how you discuss!
@ CorgiTales I agree! Thomas Jefferson even said himself that the constitution was only relevant for one generation so maybe we shouldn't be so proud about how rarely we touch the thing! There are plenty of good, rational arguments one can make about owning a gun--falling back on the constitution just because you can isn't really one of them, imo.
I totally agree with you Corgi. I live very close to a city where gang violence is prevalent and I think that while many people are sensible about guns, there are many more that are unstable and should not have access in any way. I think the safety of the majority of the population in this case should outweigh the novelty of guns being available to EVERYONE.
HA. AK-47 as a personal weapon. No. Those are for the military. Agreed, no reason whatsoever for anyone to personally own one.
Though I do think there should be something in place on military posts...they should have something. Really. I guess I am still pretty bitter about the Fort Hood shooting.
@Melissabegins - thanks! :) I'm definitely a republican who respects the democratic point of view. I just can't watch NBC during an election, I have to switch over to fox news :)
@modern - ah.. I can't watch Fox News. I am ready for a non partisan news network in this country!! I like Rachel Maddow on msnbc, but Keith Olberman blabs just too much. That's why I don't like Fox, either. I can form my OWN opinion. Just report the news! I feel like Fox is always trying to scare us, and Keith is always trying to preach.
AK's aren't even used by the US military, so it's crazy (and scary) to think of it's use as a personal weapon here!
@Melissabegins
I can't watch any sort of news without getting upset, but Fox especially pushes my buttons.
wow i'm a little surprised i didn't get flamed for that haha. i said it to a group of peers in law school once and i got attacked! i (heart) the hive..
@potatoes - i can see where you're coming from. The world is a busy and sometimes scary place. It's sometimes hard to watch the straight news without hearing a lot of opinions and fear mongering or whatever it is that the networks do. I have to take a break sometimes b/c it can get overwhelming.
I usually just read it instead. Dad screams at the t.v. so I try not to watch it when he's around anyway :P
hahah, the only time i yell back at the TV is when Miz Palin is speaking. The last thing I yelled about was when she said Obama should be more like Reagan instead of his nuclear program. HELLO! Didn't Reagan suggest the SAME THING with Gorbechev? Reduce by 1/3? Infuriating, haha. It wasn't even a far leap - a simple GOOGLING would do. See, i'm about 10 seconds away from yelling at my monitor. LOL. I'm going back to work!
I live in canada. We have to have all sorts of licences and such to own/carry a gun. My FI hunts so we do own a few guns. I dont disagree with the fact that we should have to be registered/licenced/regulated or whatever, however, some of the rules are just plain stupid!! Say hunting for example. My FI has his gun licence and hunting licence, i do not have a gun licence. If I want to shoot something, or hunt with him I need to be in arms reach of him. Who hunts like that?! I could just go and take my possestion acuisition(sp.?) course to get my gun licence, but i just dont have the time. I just dont understand the arms reach. They Make that rule so that if anything goes wrong, the one with the licence would be able to prevent it. Im sorry, when you're holding a gun that can blow a hole through a moose, I dont think there is much to prevent if something WAS to go wrong. Another thing i dont get ...and i dont know if this fits in the same category...is that, say your house is getting broken into. You cant shoot the guy, you cant hit the guy with a baseball hat, you cant even throw a frying pan at him. He can go to court and sue you, and he will win. That is so MESSED!!! I heard that in the states youhave the right to protect your territory and your house any way you need to. Is this true?? Because i know that here, If someone is crawling in though your window, and he lands on a kife and stabs himself...the home owner can be sued and held responsible. WTF? So messed.....
@ Corgi- I totally agree with you! And as someone else said, Thomas Jefferson suggested that we rewrite the Constitution every 50-100 years for the reasons you mentioned. Justice Scalia came to my law school yesterday, and he was blabbing about how we have a "dead Constitution" not a "living Constitution," and I just think he's full of crap. His originalist stance completely baffles me.
And about the issue at hand... I just think that permits are a way to try to regulate the right to bear arms. There are all types of limitations and regulations on the other amendments (which don't involve dangerous weapons), so I think it's consistent, and IMO good, that the second amendment also has limitations.
@Corgi - I agree exactly with what you said! I hadn't ever put much thought into that before, but you're so right! Why are we still living based on these rules that people living in an entirely different world created for us? It's definitely something to think about!
Just a little story! I work at a bank. We recently opened an account for a customer who imformed us that he will be carrying his gun on him when he comes in becuase he has the "right to bear arms". he even printed the constitution and gave it to us!
Also: We dont' have to have a permit to buy or carry guns here. I just bought a shot gun not too long ago and walked in the store, handed them my money, and walked out with it.
@corgi - I agree, and I think the founding fathers would have too. They never meant for those documents to be the end-all, be-all for our government.
What's more, people don't even understand them even if they think they do.
I am also glad semi-automatics are no longer allowed, and I do support permits as long as we have a fair system through which to get a permit. Living in the city, it's very... real to me. More so than when I lived in the middle of nowhere, when "gun" meant hunting rifle.
You must log in to post.
| Visit our sister sites | eHarmony Online Dating |
eHarmony Advice Dating Advice |
Project Wedding Wedding Songs |
JustMommies Pregnancy Calendar |

| User | Posts Today |
|---|---|
| Lyndzo | 46 |
| Brielle | 31 |
| funkymunky85 | 26 |
| beargoose | 24 |
| AshleyR83 | 24 |
| rebwana | 24 |
| mypinkshoes | 23 |
| his chippymunk | 23 |
| fivemonthsnotice | 23 |
| Ms. Salamander | 23 |
| User | Posts Today |
|---|---|
| BellaDee | 8 |
| JulesSchnooks | 7 |
| mightywombat | 5 |
| SouthernGirl | 5 |
| couawilou | 5 |
| Future Mrs. Martin | 3 |
| HisIrishPrincess | 3 |
| sara_tiara | 3 |
| HappilyEverAfter54 | 3 |
| KatyElle | 3 |
Why do we have the "right to bear arms" but need to have a permit to exercise that right? I dunno, I just got thinking about it.
Ok, I know we do it to make sure people know how to use their weapons, etc. To make sure people who shouldn't have them don't. But I was just thinking about how messed up that whole concept is. It's sad that our world has come to that.
I know it's kind of a hot button, and I'm not trying to start anything. Does anybody else feel like there are contradictions there?