(Closed) One videographer for 125 guests, is it enough?

posted 8 years ago in Photos/Videos
Post # 3
571 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2009

We had one and everything was captured, he used those things that hold the camera for a few double shots of the ceremony and stuff.  It all worked out beautifully.

Post # 4
2186 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: September 2010

depends if you are just looking for a wedding video or the new type of cinematography. i would suggest two camera folks though. we are doing the cinematographer and having 2-3 camera dudes. its a mini movie though… complete with trailer, sooooo might be a different style.

if they are experienced, they can have just one. it depends on the company!

Post # 5
105 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: October 2010

Well, it sounds like he is going the two camera route, so he will be able to have a steady camera as well as a roving camera.  I think one videographer is more than enough, you shouldn’t feel pressured into spending more money than you feel comfortable.  And if you’re posting it on here, you probably already know the answer 🙂

Post # 6
2362 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: June 2010 - New York Botanical Garden

We had 271 guests and 1 videographer – I haven’t seen the video yet, but they seemed confident that for that crowd, one was enough!

Post # 7
402 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: July 2011

yes that is fine. I will be using one for a 100p wedding

The topic ‘One videographer for 125 guests, is it enough?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors