Post # 1
I have no idea who to choose! I need your help! Price wise everyone is pretty much the same. But that is because I am looking to stay in a specific budget and I am willing to budge on that.
Thank you all in advance!!!!!
Post # 3
With the studio vs the photographers that are listed by name – do you get to see a specific portfolio from the photog that would be covering your event, or do they just give you whoever is available? That would be a big deal to me.
Post # 4
Those are all great choices! I chose pretty petals becuase I really liked their overhead photos as well as their detail shots- they kept it nice & light feeling while still being realistic. The others I think are too realistic for me, good pictures they just doesn’t seem very creative or unique… It all depends on what you want though, not everyone wants creative photos & things like creativity are VERY dependent on the whole “eye of the beholder” thing….
Post # 5
@crayfish: It is actually one person. She just named her photography business “studio”.
Post # 6
I chose Nichola Griner. His photos are full of color, sharp, and great compositions. I think his talent is far superior than the other ones in the poll.
Post # 8
@Peony007: I agree.
I’m CRAZY about symmetry and I liked his pictures and symmetry the best.
Post # 9
Isn’t there another post for this? I am getting major deja-vu.
Post # 10
It depends if you like the slightly desaturated, ‘vintage’ look, or the more traditional wedding photography look. If the former, then Pretty Petal gets my vote; but if the latter, Nicholas Griner definitely. They’re all great choices and take lovely shots. It’s just up to personal preference (my photographer is more of the ‘slightly desaturated and ever so slightly overexposed’ style, and I love it, but I can COMPLETELY appreciate the bolder, sharper colours of the more traditional style.)