(Closed) Question for Landlords about Pets

posted 7 years ago in Home
Post # 3
311 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: September 2010

I’m not a landlord, but I don’t think it is a bad idea.  It never hurts to ask and the worst they can tell you is no.  I would do it if I were you.  $20 a month in “pet rent” is a little ridiculous in my opinion.  I could understand if you had a new puppy or kitten that was in training or tore at things.  I say go for it! 

Post # 4
13099 posts
Honey Beekeeper
  • Wedding: July 2010

I’m not a landlord and while I don’t think your plan would hurt you in any way, I’d bet it would be a waste of time and effort.  Pet rents are pretty common (at least from my expereiences and those of friends).  They are just kind of one of those sunk costs of renting if you choose to be a pet owner.

It isn’t really one of those things that a landlord can assess on a case by case basis.  So to cover themselves for the pets that do cause damage, they have to charge for all pets.

Post # 5
1668 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: March 2012

I don’t think it hurts to ask and your approach is good.  Like PP mentioned, pet rent is pretty common in my area.  I have paid a pet deposit ($500) plus $40 a month rent.  So yeah, you got it good.  LOL  But ask, worst he can say is no. 

Post # 6
3176 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

I’d say go for it. This actually gave me the idea to do the same and we’ve lived there for 2 years. Our rent has gone up but we’ve noticed A LOT of people move out, as in we no longer have 2 bottom neighbors, a second floor neighbor, and a side neighbor. I doubt they want more people to leave so this might be a good bargaining tool in getting a cheaper rent. I think my plan will be, we’ll continue to pay pet rent but don’t increase our regular rent. Can’t hurt to try!

Post # 7
407 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: January 2011

I hate the idea of pet rent. I personally think its a money grab and don’t buy the whole “they cause more damage than the pet deposit” thing, because would the excess costs in damage not come out of your overall security deposit?

My parents are landlords to a number of properties and knowing them, they would negotiate. For them, it would be worth ditching the fee to keep a reliable/responsible tenant. If you do approach them, I would definitely make a point to say this extra cost a point you’re considering in your decision to stay put for another year vs. finding somewhere else to stay that wouldn’t charge “pet rent”. At least at that point they’ll see it as a waive the fee, or loose a good tenant scenerio. That said, if you rent from a management company, or something larger than private landlords, I wouldn’t be too optimistic about them budging. At that point, protocal is protocal and they’ll just find a new tenant to pay the fee.

I hope it works out for you. It bugs me so much to hear of someone like you with one silly cat who has to pay so much. Darling Husband and I have two cats and a large dog and all we had to pay was a $200 refundable pet deposit. Not exactly fair!

Post # 8
1120 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: July 2009

I’m a landlord. We don’t allow pets in the rental though, so the idea of “pet rent” is new to me. I don’t think it would cause any trouble to ask, but I doubt he’ll drop it from the rent. It seems like a gimmick to me to make some easy extra cash, and I doubt he’ll be willing to give that up.

No harm in trying though!

Post # 9
1120 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: July 2009

I just mentioned this to my husband, and his advice is to go with your plan (steam clean and invite landlord for inspection), with the angle that you’ve already paid a lot of “pet rent” in additon to the deposit, and that you’re not prepared to pay it amymore and will be moving out if it’s not dropped from the rent.

He suggests that that’s the way to make him think twice about refusing, since with your current plan there’s nothing for him to lose in just saying no.

Good luck!

Post # 10
1116 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: August 2008

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to ask your landlord.  Long term good tenants are the goal of most landlords, so you might approach it as “we’d like to stay here for 2 more years, we like the house, etc. but we think our pet isn’t causing the type of damage the extra fees are for, and we’ve already paid X amount of extra rent for the animal.”  You could also settle for a reduction in the fee, if he’s not willing to waive it completely.

My husband and I are in the process of buying a rental property, so while I don’t have experience with tenants yet, we have been doing a lot of number crunching and looking at properties that have been lived in by pets and not.  We’ve seen a lot of homes with excessive pet hair and carpet stains, and even those with the carpets removed, can still have an odor.  From what I know, most landlords aim to give the walls a fresh coat of paint, clean the carpets, and scrub the kitchen/bathroom between tenants (at most) – pretty minor expenses.  Replacing flooring gets expensive fast and increases down time between tenants.  Anyway, I think that’s why the pet rent is reasonable in many cases.  BUT if your animal isn’t causing that kind of damage, and you keep the place clean, I think it’s worth asking for some leniency.


Post # 12
3041 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: May 2010

I don’t see any harm in asking what you said. However, another option is to ask that the “pet-rent” be refundable so long as there are no cat-damages when you move out. Make sure you take TONS of pics of everything, every room, everywhere.

Post # 13
3049 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: January 1991

I think it’s definitely reasonable. I wouldn’t ask them to drop the pet rent until a year after you’ve leased with them though. You signed the lease and agreed to pet rent for a year, if you continue to live there and there wasn’t any damage last year… then I would definitely ask to drop the pet rent (just like you only pay pet deposit once). And actually, when you move out, I would also ask as a compromise if any of the pet deopsit can be refunded. Legally they don’t have to, but if you have a nice landlord (like mine) he/she will refund the deposit for the most part.

Post # 14
7174 posts
Busy Beekeeper

I used to be a landlord and we allowed a pet (with no deposit).  I live in the house I used to rent and seeing the scratches the dog left on the floors and the smell of pee that lingered in the back yard on the brick patio was annoying but not the end of the world. 

All that said – I think what you are asking is MORE than reasonable.  What kind of lease do you have?  If it’s close to the time it’s up, it may be more of an incentive for your landlord to re-write it – especially if you a good tenant.  The prospect of finding a good tenant would be enough to waive the $20 fee.  Also – if the landlord sounds like they are open to it – you might want to offer a routine inspection in yearly (or whatever) intervals – just so they have peace of mind.

Edit: don’t worry about pictures on the wall – everyone puts pictures on the wall!  If you could have the house spotless (similar as you would if you were selling it) it will make a great impression and show that you are taking good care of the property.

Post # 15
1941 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: June 2012

I would die for only $20 a month pet rent. We have two chihuahuas, and our pet rent is $50 per pet, so $100 a month. I don’t think it would necessarily hurt to ask, but don’t get your hopes up. While this is the most I’ve ever paid in pet rent, I’ve never had an apartment that didn’t require *something* for a monthly fee.

The topic ‘Question for Landlords about Pets’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors