No newer images
more by 2bMrsBear
Possible to lose 10lbs in a month?! AhHHH!
Show 'em off ladies! :)
more in Rings
Cushion Cut Solitaries
What are you doing right now? 1/12 Edition
more in Boards
Were fighting.... :( vent

Same carat but different sizes??

posted 2 years ago in Rings
  •  
    1.
    Member Icon
    Member
    39 posts
    Newbee
    2bMrsBear    April 2010   NY

    So I hear some cuts look smaller than other even with the same carat size?

    Do you know which cut looks the larger and what looks the smallest?

     
    2.
    14,581 posts
    Honey
    Beekeeper
    ejs4y8    June 20, 2009  

    Cushion cuts look smaller. They are very deep and really sparkly, but yeah, they look a little smaller.

    My jeweler told me round ones look the biggest. They can be flatter and therefore have a larger face.

    http://www.ajediam.com/Sizes-of-Diamonds.html

    You can compare mm x mm. You can click on the diamond shape and then compare them, too! Super conveneint

     
    3.
    Member Icon
    Member
    972 posts
    Busy bee
    surkim    September 2, 2012  

    Ajediam is awesome.

    I like http://www.jewelry-secrets.com/ for other questions regarding diamonds.

     
    4.
    Member
    9,967 posts
    Buzzing
    Beekeeper
    CorgiTales    February 1, 2011  

    way to be handy with the links ejs ;)

    I agree... Rounds look the biggest. The shapes I considered were cushion, asscher, and radiant. Of those, in my opinion, radiant looks the biggest, then cushion, then asscher.

    Keep in mind though that two stones of the same shape and weight may look bigger/smaller based on the cut. If a stone is very shallow top to bottom, the face will be bigger and it will look bigger **but** it won't sparkle nearly as much and won't be as pretty of a stone. You don't necessarily want to get the stone that looks the biggest, but the one that really jumps out at you.

     
    5.
    Member
    526 posts
    Busy bee
    lara bee    9/4/09   Minneapolis

    It also has more to do with the cut of the diamond too. So keep that in mind as well.  And when I say cut, I don't mean shape. I mean the symmetry, the proportions, etc.  If the diamond is "top heavy" for example, the bulk of the diamond is at the top and makes it look bigger.

     
    6.
    Member
    6,816 posts
    Busy
    Beekeeper
    moderndaisy    June 2010  

    I've been told that round brilliant looks the biggest and any diamond with a better cut looks bigger as its more sparkly. But diamonds can be cut to any shape, mine is 2.1 carats and I don't think it looks that big b/c the table is very small. I've seen 1.5 carats on my friends that look bigger at first glance b/c they have a larger table. Don't know if I'm right here, just my observations.

     
    7.
    Member Icon
    Member
    39 posts
    Newbee
    2bMrsBear    April 2010   NY

    Wow~ your links are awesome!! Thanks!!

     
    8.
    Member Icon
    Member
    4 posts
    Wannabee
    dncs    May 30, 2010  

    pricescope.com is an awesome web site. Read through the "knowledge" section, they talk about this issue.  It was invaluable resource when we picked our stone.

     
    9.
    Member Icon
    Member
    6,442 posts
    Bee Keeper
    KMSull    August 7, 2010   Lexington, KY (via Atlanta, GA)

    We went ring shopping last week and I honestly think a pear looks bigger than a round! I compared them for about 5 minutes. Its a shallower underbody so you get more weight on top... I liked it alot more, too.

     
    10.
    Member
    1,176 posts
    Bumble bee
    jhphi    January 1, 2008  

    buffy posted this on another board post today-- maybe have a look?

    "This PDF will also help you with sizing- enlarge it to 100% for the best comparison.

    http://images.amazon.com/media/i3d/01/actual-diamond-size.pdf "

     
    11.
    Member
    1,258 posts
    Bumble bee
    MrsK2be    November 15, 2008   Ohio

    Everyone says Rounds appear biggest usually.   But for some reason, when I see elongated shaped stones (Pear, Marquis, Emerald) they seem to appear bigger to me.  But that might just be my own weird perceptions...

     
    12.
    Member Icon
    Member
    1,116 posts
    Bumble bee
    twalila    May 2010   Ohio

    I am such a weirdo.  I have a 2 ct radiant but perfect square.  The amazon chart from jhphi shows a rectangular rad which for some reason looked bigger.  I had my diamond reset after a bad fall and for a split second feared they switched out my diamond for something smaller (I'd only had it for a week, I'd have never known!).  I jjust printed out the chart and measured my rad against a princess (since they're both square).  Phew, it's still the right size.

    Now to find my loupe and sure it's the right diamond...

     
    13.
    Bee
    2,837 posts
    Sugar bee
    locket    September 25, 2010  

    I was told that the round brilliant cut look the biggest..And I also saw a huge difference from stone to stone when we went to upgrade to a larger carat weight....the  way it is cut will change the perception of how big it is

     
    14.
    Member
    2,411 posts
    Buzzing bee
    vintage2010    April 10, 2010  

    I agree with the others, another one that can appear bigger is the Oval cut.  But it depends on how deep/shallow the bottom of the stone is.

    My SIL and I both have a 2ct stone. Mine is a cushion cut and her's is a princess cut.  My stone looks almost double the size of hers because of the cut but also because mine is a halo so the setting is larger. If that makes sense.  I love both rings because I helped my brother pick her's out (man was I nervous about picking out another girl's ring)...

     
    15.
    Member
    1,644 posts
    Bumble bee
    Mermaid1082    September 4, 2010   St Louis, MO

    I think the setting makes a HUGE difference!  Halos always look bigger.

    I think radiants and cushions look smaller than their carat size, but they have SOOOOOO much sparkle!  The other Cs make an impact too!

     
    16.
    Member Icon
    Member
    6,442 posts
    Bee Keeper
    KMSull    August 7, 2010   Lexington, KY (via Atlanta, GA)

    Oooh I just realized that I forgot to try the oval thanks to this post. Bummer.

     
    17.
    Member Icon
    Member
    6 posts
    Newbee
    NicoleBianca    May 15, 2010   Florida

    Bravo for knowledge ladies! I'm a Gemologist so let me shed some light. Yes, carat is a weight and it correlated directly to the measurements of the diamond depending on the cut which includes the shape, as well as proportions.  Generally speaking any stone that is elongated will look slightly larger for its weight (oval, emerald, pear, radiant) but the diameter of the stone is most impacted by the depth of the stone. 

    According to the GIA, the ideal depth for a round brilliant cut diamond is between 57-62% this can be used as a general rule for other stones as well keeping in mind that cushion, asscher, and some older cut rounds will always have a higher depth % and therefore will generally look slightly smaller.  In addition it is always important to check the girdle (edge) of the diamond as it is the widest part of the stone, if it is thick than it can also hold weight and make a stone look smaller....

    And finally before you get too wrapped up in the technicality of the process, take a breath and ask yourself, do I love it??? Because at the end of the day, that's what matters, not what the crown angles are, or the depth percentages.  Do you love it on your hand, does it make you smile everytime you look down?  Your eyes and your heart don't lie, when you put it on and its beautiful and it makes your heart sing, that's the ring for you=)

     
    18.
    Member Icon
    Member
    41 posts
    Newbee
    Miss Badger      

    NicoleBianca, I was actually told this too about the elongated stones.  I have an oval because I liked how it looked on my finger. 

    I think diamonds look different on everyone's hand.  For me, I have very small, short fingers so the oval was a great choice.  All that really matters is how it looks on your hand.  For people with larger fingers and hands, my ring will probably look different.  It's all perspective.

     
    19.
    Member
    472 posts
    Helper bee
    amanda44    August 13, 2011   kalispell

    round looks biggest!!!

     
    20.
    Member
    2,525 posts
    Sugar bee
    daniellemybelle    June 19, 2010   Baltimore, MD

    I think the reason rounds look biggest is because they are so very sparkly. I think the more sparkly a stone, the bigger it looks, at least at first glance. 

     

    Reply

    You must log in to post.

    Tags:





    Visit our sister sites eHarmony
    Online Dating
    eHarmony Advice
    Dating Advice
    Project Wedding
    Wedding Songs
    JustMommies
    Pregnancy Calendar
    Copyright 2004-2012, Weddingbee.com
     

    Find your vendors on Weddingbee

    Real reviews from brides in your area!

    Favors by Weddingbee

    • Favors by season

    Shop Now ยป

    Find Registry Find Registry Find Registry

    More
    User Posts Today
    MissBoPeep 74
    hisgoosiegirl 42
    beargoose 42
    akp0702 41
    Mrs.KMM 40
    ndreighton 38
    stardustintheeyes 34
    BetterSherm 33
    Gemstone 31
    MrsPom 31

    Rings

    User Posts Today
    JustLove25 15
    GelaMac 13
    lilsweetie 7
    komatsu 7
    helena31 7
    Mrs.danish 6
    MerryWidow 5
    capergrrl 5
    Hespurrfect4me 5
    sopranokris 5
    More