Weddingbee boards

'Ello, Bees! After a lot of discussion about it, FI and I have decided to upgrade/replace my e-ring. The original ring is beautiful and will always be sentimental to me, but it's a pearl and already showing signs of wear and I can't find ANY wedding band that I like with it. I prefer not to own a diamond for multiple reasons, so we settled on Moissanite (which is far better for our budget, anyway). I want to wear my e-ring/wedding band together, so I've been perusing their sets and have finally narrowed it down to two choices. However, I am 100% stuck!!!

#1: Cushion-cut halo with side stones and matching band (more views)

#2: Round antique with a thin silver band (more views)

Both are equally appealing to me. I've tried on cushion-cut halos and antique-style rings at jewelry stores, so I have a pretty good visual of what both would look like. I love love love all of the detail in the antique-style ring, but the matching band is a little "blah" to me. At the same time, I'm a little worried that the halo will be too blingy and I'll end up feeling uncomfortable wearing it. Money-wise, ring #1 is about $300 more than ring #2, but both are well within our budget.

I know it's ultimately up to me, but I figured I'd post a poll and see what everyone here thinks :)

I don't like halos so this was an easy vote for me!

@Over the Moon:  Yeah, I'm worried most about a band with that one (especially since I can't actually see them together). It just looks too thin next to the thicker ring. Idk. Maybe I can try and do some online searching and find pictures of someone wearing them together.

Since you said you like antique styles I voted for #2.  I actually like that the band is so simple; it's a nice contrast with the ornate ering.

Anyone have suggestions for what kind/style of band might work better with #2?

@ArwenBride:  Yeah, that is something I'm keeping in mind - I'm clumsy as hell, and I also work in an area where it isn't always prudent to be wearing flashy jewelry, so I'd like the option to wear my band (haha, the plan band WOULD do good for that though).

I suppose I could always either order the ring + band and decide once I get it, or just buy the ring solo and search for a more complimentary band.

wow, they are both very different. i was expecting something a bit more similar.  which one would match your everyday style more?  which one do you see yourself wearing in 10, 20, 30+ years?  can you wearing the matching band by itself ?

personally, i love the first one.  i love cushion cut and i really like the halo thing.  i have just never been into the scrolling, antique look myself.

both very beautiful.  can't go wrong with either.

@ArwenBride:  Thanks, those are really beautiful! I think I like the middle one the best, I like that it replicates the pear-shaped side stones (which is actually my fave part of ring #2) and I think the spacing would look really nice. Hmm, I think you may have helped me make a decision!

@mypinkshoes:  The more I think about it, I believe #2 would be the best choice for me. I love the look of Halos, but I've always been more about detail and design which the antique gives.

I will probably get a halo right-hand ring at some point because I do really love how they look. I definitely enjoy the "polished" look that set #1 presents, but the antique is absolutely more true to "me" and my personality.

@jocember:  that sounds like a great compromise. can't wait to see your pics.

@MissGreenBean:  It is gorgeous, isn't it? I hope that your BFF is able to steer him in the right direction :)

@starla:  Oh wow, they have some gorgeous bands! Thanks for the link. Yeah, I just talked to FI about it over the phone and he told me he was secretly pulling for ring #2 but wanted me to make the decision. I didn't even think about the potential to lose stones in the multistone band... eik, that's a scary thought and I'd always be worrying about that!

I also agree that size-wise, it'd be similar to what I have now. I'm comfortable with the size/styling of my current ring, so that'd be a plus.

@MissPine:  I definitely will! Our timeline for the replacement is probably going to be our 5-year anniversary in September, since we both have some financial obligations that need to be taken care of before a "frivilous" purchase is made.

But I will be sure to post the ring porn whenever I do get it :) I'm kind of hoping maybe he'll surprise me earllier than September, but he's not a big surprise guy so that's doubtful lol.

Maybe something like these?

http://www.moissaniteco.com/milgrain-bezel-round-moissanite-eternity-ring-p-8196.html

http://www.brilliantearth.com/True-Heart-Ring-White-Gold-BE259/

The ring's thick enough wearing rings on separate hands might be worth considering as well, then you wouldn't have to worry about finding a band that's just right.  Honestly, I think it would be worth getting the matching band just to see if it'll work.

@ArwenBride:  Holy crap that last band you posted made my jaw drop to the FLOOR!

@jocember:  I voted for 1 as is, because I do think it has a classic look to it, where the antique one might not look as good in person and the matching band is blah and doesn't match it all that well, IMO.  If you were to pick one of the fancier engraved bands to pair with it, then I would like it more (depending on what it looked like on your hand, of course).  So basically, I'm no help.

i like them both but i think #2 has more flair and orginality...plus you can do some awesome looks with a diff band

I chose number 2 becuase I like the uniqueness of the swirls and how it looks classic and antique in style. I don't think you can go wrong with either of them, but I vote #2

I love #1. I'm not a fan of #2 at all, personally!

I'm not a fan of number 1 ... I do however love 2 ....:)