- Blog
- Bios
- Boards
- Classifieds
- DIY
- Gallery
- Vendor Reviews
- Shop Weddingbee
I think most people side on the girl's side because we are usually the one with a timeline. As nature has dictated, there is a limited number of years for a woman to achieve her goals in terms of a family, etc. Yes, currently you see many women over 40 getting pregnant, married, etc, but that is not the norm, and in many cases it is with the help of fertility treatments. Biologically, our chances of contraception decrease by 50% at the age of 35, and the risk associated with birth defects and other complications increases tremendously. Men do not have this same predicament. They can reproduce at 20 or 60, it is exactly the same. It is my opinion that that is the reason why women are oftentimes ready for marriage when men are not, we are biologically predetermined to be so since our bodies are aware that "the clock is ticking", so to speak.
Some people would have pushed for an ultimatum, but it depends on the relationship. I agree with Ms. Penguin; my FI would have never taken an ultimatum. He would have seen it as an insult and walked out on anyone had they given him an ultimatium, especially about something as important as marriage. That being said, he knew he wanted to marry me from the day he met me. So while we have been together 3 1/2 years, I was very aware of the engagement discussions and progression of our relationship. We both knew our goal was to get married and start a family. From the situation stated above, it seems she was neither certain those were his goals, nor was she certain they would EVER be his goals with her, and that is a big part of it.
If he was really certain she was "The One", he would have not let her walk away, maybe he would not have proposed but he would have definitely put up a fight or she would have put up a fight not letting him walk away. You don't know whether or not she had been trying to have this discussion with him about their future only to be faced with no communication on the matter. Without knowing the details, I think he was just not sure she was it and was willing to take the chance. In her case, she has certain goals in mind and the older she gets the more difficult those goals become to achieve, albeit it not so much in our society, but biologically.
I can't blame her for wanting to move on. In fact, I would have done it sooner. Ultimatums usually end poorly, but deep in her heart, if a girl is in a position to give one, she probably already knows it will most likely end poorly.
What's the problem with the ultimatum? What makes it an ultimatum? The tone of her voice? Before she just says "see ya", she wants to tell him why. ("I want to get married. If you don't propose, I'm gone.") If she is holding out that that will definitely bring him around, think again. But I think it's fair to both of them, for her to tell him where he stands before she breaks if off. Afterall, she invested 9 years with him. If she never had the guts to bring it up before, I can't blame her for finally doing it. But regardless of it being an "ultimatum", if a couple has been together for that long, and hasn't discussed marriage, or hasn't come to an agreement on marriage, (and one of them is unhappy) it's no wonder why they usually end as they do.
The problem with distinguishing not-ready-for-marriage and commitment-phobes is that both can sound the same in practice and the only way to tell them apart is time. Each could give "finishing school" as a valid reason for postponing marriage, but it isn't until you have actually finished school you will discover if he (or she) is ready or if another reason will manifest itself.
I have a friend whose relationship fits this situation. They have been together since 19, middle of college, so 6 years now. They have discussed getting married forever, but always said they were going to do it after they graduated. He is in the military, and that turned into "after he graduates special forces school" which turned into "after he's served a deployment" which turned into "by Christmas 2008" and now it's "after he's served two deployments." I think she's on the verge of giving him an ultimatum and I don't blame her. She doesn't know whether to trust his new goals anymore or if he really just isn't going to marry her. All of those goals sound reasonable but when you get a track record of not keeping any of them you start looking a lot like a commitment-phobe. I worry for the future of their relationship.
Although as a strategy, having a reasonable conversation beats ultimatums, sometimes ultimatums can be useful, albeit for more nefarious purposes. I think by the time most people give an ultimatum they're already this-close to being finished with the relationship. If he doesn't want to commit, then they want a reason to leave right now and an ultimatum opens that door.
I think what makes an ultimatum an ultimatum is the intent of the speaker: they give a strict timeline usually based on an arbitrary exterior standard (the end of the year, or graduation, etc.) and give the consequence for not following through as breaking up. The partner gets no input in changing the parameters. It is not a mutual decision.
I'm not a fan of an ultimatum since it's about putting your desires ahead of your SO's and not really trying to meet halfway. I do think, however, that she had good reason to end the relationship, although I wish she had done it another way. They should have sat down and had a mature discussion about where the relationship was going and she should have discussed how their timelines matched up (which they didn't appear to at all). Then she could have ended the relationship because she was ready for the next phase in life and it didn't look like he would be ready for a long time.
I just think there is a difference between talking about your goals and hopes (including a timeline for marriage) and saying "if you don't propose by X date, I am leaving you." Probably most of us have had conversations with their mates about their goals and when you hope/expect to get married. Those conversations are healthy, and necessary. I even had a conversation with my FI along the lines of "if we want to get married next year, we need to get engaged soon. really soon." My FI and I were together for 7.5 years and probably some people thought he would never propose. We both wanted the same things (to get married), but he had to finish med school and earn a little money before he could feel ready to buy a ring, etc. I was anxious to get engaged, but, given our personalities, knew that if I set a deadline for him, it would have not been productive.
The difference, I think, is when a threat is made. It starts a ticking clock that can't be reset. In situations where I have seen an actual deadline given, I have only seen it end well once. (She gave a deadline for him to propose since they already had a wedding place booked, etc.)
I can't say that I blame her though. Once you stop feeling that you are getting what you want in your relationship, it is really hard to focus on anything else. I suppose the other option would have been for her to set a deadline for herself and when the deadline passes, to explain to him why she is ending the relationship.
Sometimes, I think ultimatums are not cruel or manipulative or arbitrary so much as they are the only honest expression of what a person is feeling. "I love you and I want to marry you, but if you don't want to marry me, I need to move on because I am not happy continuing to be just your girlfriend. You have until the end of the year to decide if you are ready to make that committment. I love you but I won't wait any longer than that." If your friend's ex loved him but was completely fed up with relationship limbo and would rather break up than keep waiting for him to decide, it sounds like she was just being honest with him about what she wanted and how long she was willing to wait.
Put it another way: Would it have been better if, on New Year's Day, she said, "I'm tired of waiting for you to propose and I'm breaking up with you" with absolutely no warning? She let him know she was unhappy and gave your friend the opportunity to make a decision, at least -- and it sounds a bit like he just crossed his fingers and hoped she wouldn't follow through. Did he try to talk to her about an alternate timeline, or give her some idea of when *he* would like to get married?
My fiance and I had decided that March was the best time of year for us to get married. I told him I wanted at least 9 months to get married and I didn't want to wait until 2010. I said "I better have a ring by June 2008 so I can plan the wedding". This scared him enough to propose in May but I really had no consequence if he didn't come through. He is the man for me and I would never be able to let him go. But my empty threat worked....
I never gave him an ultimatum but we came to the decision together that once we had lived together for a year it was time to take the next step. We discussed getting engaged/married often enough that I felt comfortable "reminding" him about two months before he proposed ... little did I know that it was already in the works and he had just told the first people (his best friend and my sister!) that he was going to be doing it soon. When I gently reminded him he said to me, "Please don't mention it again, you know that I know we're ready, and it's coming ..." with a giant smirk on his face. You know I never mentioned it again and was totally shocked the day it happened.
I think you are all awesome ladies and I thank you for your insight!
While I have always haded the idea of an ultimatum and would never consider giving one, I would absolutely move along if I realized someone I was dating didn't want the same thing I did. Isn't that why people have exes? As it was, I was less than a year out of college and happy to be just dating my boyfriend when he proposed. Of course, I was even happier to be engaged! If we had dated for 9 years though, I would definitely have a talk with him, let him know I was interested in getting married... was he? And if not, it's harsh but I imagine I would look for someone who was. I don't think it's any different than breaking up with someone because they want to live in the country and you want to live in the city, or you wan't to go out on the weekends and they like quiet nights at home... if you don't want the same thing, one of you will be compromising. It seems like she compromised with him for a long time.
I spent 4 years dating a guy that I thought I would one day marry and spend the rest of my life with. The straw the broke the camel's back was when at our friend's engagement party, everyone was teasing us say "You're next!" He snapped and screamed out loud "I am not getting engaged for a long time, if ever! So quit talking about it." Needless to say I was mortified. This was a man who had talked about a future with me.
A month later I told him that it obviously wasn't going to work because we wanted different things. He cried like a baby and said he'd do anything to keep me. I was so disappointed and heartbroken that I just wanted to move on with my life.
I totally understand how this woman feels. Also just as an FYI - I met my husband 4 months after I left my ex and we were married 6 months after that! I've never been happier!
mrsbutler23: Your story actually made my eyes well up with tears. How awful of your ex. I'm so glad you're SOOOO happy!
I never gave an ultimatum, but I thought about it at times. It's tough, because I've known I wanted to marry my boyfriend for a while, and then he even knew he wanted to marry me SOMEDAY for quite a bit, but he wasn't sure when. I agree with a lot of the bees that the ultimatum is kinda a dealbreaker if it's done the wrong way. Eventually, I sat him down and told him that I really wanted to start planning it now and get a firm timeline because I love him and it was tearing me up to wait without knowing how long. I was thrilled to find out we were on the same page - he had just needed to catch up to me.
But that doesn't work for everyone. I feel bad for both of them since it sounds like they are both heartbroken, but neither of them seemed to really try and make it happen by setting a timeline, proposing, etc. Would a lifetime of frustration be better than this? It's such a tough choice and one that I don't think any of us here can make for them since we aren't there to see what's happened. I wish them both the best!
To have gotten to the point of a deadline ultimatum must have meant there was already some fundamental issues in their relationship for quite some time. As always, communication is key. I would assume that if they loved each other so deeply, both he and she would know how the other feels and what is important to their significant other.
There should have been conversations about their life and future together. If you could plan to go to school or plan to have a career path, you can certainly plan to get married...at least have a plan together.
I wonder if they discussed what marriage meant to each other and how their thoughts would compare and contrast. Getting engaged by definition means you are promising to spend your life with your loved one. That takes zero dollars to do. Just the thought of knowing that the person you love wants to marry you is far better than a diamond ring. The ring is just a pretty symbol. I will give him the benefit of the doubt since he seems so caught up with the financial aspect of getting married. Perhaps all she wanted to know what that he wanted to be with her the rest of their lives. He didn't do that.
Just maybe he didn't know what a good thing he had going for him. It would take a breakup to realize what he lost. So, if he doesn't go after her, that definitely means he doesn't love her enough...at least not more a married lifetime.
Wow such an interesting post! I think 9 years is quite a long time to be in a relationship and not take the next step. If he REALLY wanted it to work out then he should of talked to her about it and work out a compromise.
My fiance and I always talked about getting married after a few years together. I wanted to get married so badly plus I was done with school and had a job so I was ready. I didn't exactly gave my fiance an ultimatum but I did tell him that I wanted to get engaged by 2008. I didn't say I would leave or anything if he didn't cause I knew that he would propose by then and he did. He was totally fine with it as long as we didn't get married the following year.
An interesting post definitely. I'm currently waiting and have been in the relationship for 10 years. It started in high school and at first it was completely normal to not think of marriage as I finished high school and worked my way through college, did a post-college internship and finally got a job. I didn't even start thinking about marriage until about 2 years ago at year 8 - when you start a relationship young, it's easy to spend a lot of years getting ready because you're both learning to become adults while learning about each other. Starting a 9 year relationship at 19 is definitely not the same as starting it at 29 for example.
Since you weren't in the relationship I don't know if you knew whether they had addressed the prospect of marriage before and whether she discussed a rough timeline with him before she gave him the ultimatum so she could learn when he was thinking about marriage. Because men are on different timelines than women, it probably would have caught him by surprise, but maybe some compromise could have taken place at that stage. If he still wasn't talking about marriage at all, I definitely agree she was in the right to give the ultimatum - he needs to understand she just can't wait forever.
That being said, it's still an unfortunate situation. He might have been using it as an excuse, but maybe he legitimately thought he couldn't support a wife or buy a engagement ring - which is unfortunate. What men don't understand is that modern women aren't expecting him to buy a $10K ring or foot the bill for a major wedding blowout on his own. For the most part the engagement period is used to save up for the wedding and since she's working as well, she's definitely capable of contributing as well. The fact that he's using money as the sole reason not to propose sounds like an excuse for the fact that he just didn't feel ready and didn't want to admit it.
The big bummer for her? At 28, it'll probably take him a few more years to feel ready for marriage if he IS the marrying-type, he'll meet someone else and will propose after dating for 6-months. It's kind of like a no-win situation for the girlfriend.
I don' t think the issue is really the 9 years. I think when one person is ready to be married, then it's really hard to hang around indefinitely with someone who isn't. Especially if she was looking back and thinking, "Wow, I've dated the same person my entire adult life. If I want to have kids, I possibly want to thinking about that in the next 5 years or so, and if it's not going to happen with this guy then I need to time to move on, learn a little bit more about dating as an adult, and then figure out what comes next." So my point is, if she had started dating him at 26, then maybe 2-3 years would be long enough. While it's incredibly romantic to think that there is only one right person, I don't really think there is. Relationships have as much to do with timing as they do with the people involved in it. fizicsGuy tells me he pretty much knew I would be a keeper from the day he met me. But he was incredibly awkward around me and never told me his feelings until 4 years later. I admit it's still hard for me to completely understand (esp. b/c he was in a relationship for 2 of those years), but he says he knew that earlier he wasn't ready to be with the person he wanted to be with. He waited to show me his feelings b/c he knew he'd likely mess it up if he'd done so earlier.
I think the word ultimatum can be misinterpreted...it's possible also that she was just honestly letting him know where she stood. I know that deciding what to do after grad school was agonizing b/c we were not engaged yet. He wasn't dictating what I did (but he already had moved and had a new job), but I felt like I was choosing between him and my career. Of course, it was me who was being indecisive on marriage, so it's a bit different. My point is that for someone who really believes in marriage, like me, no other type of commitment is as satisfactory. And being in the gray zone can really hinder your ability to make life decisions. I'm so happy I chose him (and found a good job), but I'm wondering if in your friend's ex's case having the flexibility to broaden her job search isn't also an issue. Finishing grad school and not being able to find a job can be incredibly demoralizng and almost as devastating at least in the short term as losing a relationship.
I think the key point here is, "but couldn't give her what she needed/wanted." She certianly did the right thing by breaking up and being true to herself. But she likely could have dealt with it in a more adult way than with an ultimatum, and could have possibly had a different outcome.
Marriage and commitment can stir up some pretty intense emotions, sometimes people take extreme measures!
You must log in to post.
| Visit our sister sites | eHarmony Online Dating |
eHarmony Advice Dating Advice |
Project Wedding Wedding Songs |
JustMommies Pregnancy Calendar |

| User | Posts Today |
|---|---|
| MissBoPeep | 93 |
| beargoose | 55 |
| hisgoosiegirl | 51 |
| ndreighton | 51 |
| Mrs.KMM | 46 |
| BetterSherm | 42 |
| akp0702 | 41 |
| stardustintheeyes | 36 |
| MrsPom | 36 |
| Beckster329 | 36 |
| User | Posts Today |
|---|---|
| stace0616 | 5 |
| Miss Circe | 4 |
| Scottish_lassie | 4 |
| MissHoney | 4 |
| redroses76 | 4 |
| bellasperanza | 4 |
| MissBoPeep | 3 |
| AnastasiaM | 3 |
| MsMamaBear | 2 |
| MrsCarnival | 2 |