(Closed) Wedding band help! -Pics included-

posted 7 years ago in Rings
  • poll: Too much?
    Geez! You're blinding me! (in a good way) : (13 votes)
    20 %
    Geez! You're blinding me! (in a bad way) : (53 votes)
    80 %
  • Post # 3
    Member
    6473 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: June 2011 - Sydney, Australia

    It’s gorgeous – I’m curious to see what just one of the ring halves would look like flush with your e-ring.

    Post # 4
    Member
    4804 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: August 2012

    I voted for the second option.  I think the ring guard is nice but it does take away from your engagement ring.  Your engagement ring has kind of a classic, simple feel that the guard doesn’t.  And also I think the guard takes away from the Emerald shape since the center stone doesn’t go past the edges of it (I hope that makes sense).  I think it would look nicer with a similar style but not the baguette diamonds, just the row of pavé Smile

    Post # 5
    Member
    4137 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: May 2011

    i think it’s WAY too much. you can barely even see the e-ring in the middle.

    Post # 6
    Member
    1664 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: May 2011

    I would try a thin pave band or band with small baguettes maybe?  They have rings that have the dip in the middle so they should sit flush.

    Post # 9
    Member
    2402 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: August 2012

    My personal opinion is that the ring guard takes away from your e-ring.. I like the pave diamonds on it, but not the baguettes. But go with what you like!

    Post # 10
    Member
    1729 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: July 2012

    Sorry Hon, I also think it’s too much. Your e-ring is sooooo classy and lovely and perfectly chic. A giant wrap around it makes it… not. I would go with something perhaps like this?

    But even the milgrain might be too much. IDK. Or maybe with channelled baguettes instead would be better. What do you think?

    Post # 11
    Member
    971 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2008

    Sometimes less is more!

    Post # 12
    Member
    1801 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: June 2010

    I think it’s really pretty.  As a set, it looks nice.  But if you’re wanting to keep the e-ring as the centerpiece, then it’s too much.  The center stone gets a little lost in all the other stones (at least in the photos, the real life 3D could be different).

    Post # 13
    Member
    5993 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: May 2010

    i voted its good bling – i like diamonds!

     

    Post # 14
    Member
    1851 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: March 2012

    I voted that it was a bit too much…I LOVE bling but your ering is so naturally beautiful and classic I think that the guard takes away from it and kind of dates the ring. I would immediately assume it was a ring from the 80s or 90s with such a huge guard. If it’s what you love then go with it though because regardless of what anyone else says you should have something that YOU think is beautiful!

    Post # 15
    Member
    3222 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2011

    I voted for the second option too. You need a classic eternity or even a plain white gold (or platinum) band that won’t take away from your gorgeous e-ring!

    Post # 16
    Member
    3525 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: December 2010

    Definitely too much…sorry.

    The topic ‘Wedding band help! -Pics included-’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors