What do y'all think of this ring?

posted 2 years ago in Rings
  • poll: What do you think?
    Beautiful. : (31 votes)
    52 %
    Eh, okay. : (22 votes)
    37 %
    Th ring sucks. You suck. No diamonds for you! : (7 votes)
    12 %
  • Post # 2
    3668 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    I would check with a jeweler and make sure that setting can be resized by that much. I would bet not with that pave. 

    Post # 3
    667 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: October 2014

    Is it from e-bay?

    One bee posted a link to e-bay shop with extremely cheap rings.. Just hope you are not going to buy something there!

    Post # 4
    103 posts
    Blushing bee

    I love that!! 

    Post # 5
    713 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2014

    Because the pave only goes around a little I think it should be ok to size if you go to a master jeweler. They will add gold to make it bigger then tighten all the stones at the top of the band.  


    I love it!

    Post # 6
    7936 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: September 2015

    Might be the pic but it looks like the cut might not be so good and it’s visibly included. what are the stats? Is it certified?

    Post # 7
    397 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: October 2015 - Hanover Grande Ballroom

    it does look visibly included.

    Post # 8
    549 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2017

    I like the setting but something is off with the stone. It doesn’t look good (could be the pics). Being a size 9 also, I’d have the ring replicated in my size instead of getting it stretched. Wouldn’t want to risk losing side stones

    Post # 9
    539 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: July 2014

    If you want an honest opinion, the diamond quality looks absolutely horrible in both cut and clarity.  If neither of those qualities are important to you then I would go ahead and check with a jeweler on resizing before you purchase. 

    Post # 10
    1762 posts
    Buzzing bee

    The stone doesn’t look good. Post the stats

    Post # 11
    1465 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: January 2015

    I can really clearly see the inclusions in the stone, which means its an I2-3 clarity. I know having a big stone is nice, but you really shouldn’t pay any more than about $1500 for that ring with clarity like that.

    Post # 12
    6453 posts
    Bee Keeper

    There are many rings that look similar to this one. It’s not necessarily what I would pick, but what matters is that you like it and you love the person who got it for you.

    Leave a comment

    Sent weekly. You may unsubscribe at any time.

    Find Amazing Vendors