What do you think of this setting?

posted 3 years ago in Rings
Post # 2
13752 posts
Honey Beekeeper
  • Wedding: June 2011

I like it!  I’m not sure what a “modern” setting would be though.  That looks like a pretty nice twist on a classic solitare to me.

Post # 3
553 posts
Busy bee

ButterflyButterfly:  it’s a pretty ring. But your friend has to ask herself if she’s only getting it for the good deal (and not thrilled with it), or she loves it and lucky it’s at a good price. If it’s the first, she may regret it down the road, no matter how great a deal it was. As for the style, it’s plenty “modern.” What exactly does she consider modern/not modern? And does it matter? styles change and 5-10-15 years down the line, it may/may not be modern anymore. 

To to sum up: if she loves it, she should get it. If she’s hedging, keep looking. 

Post # 5
1913 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: September 2014 - Dallas, TX

ButterflyButterfly:  I like it! My ring has a similar split shank although without the two side stones.

Post # 6
13752 posts
Honey Beekeeper
  • Wedding: June 2011

If she likes it, then thats all she should be concerned with!  likevintagelover said, styles change all the time anyways.  It shouldnt matter if its classified as modern/vintage/classic/whatever, who cares if there’s a lot or a little settings out there like it only one person has to love it and that’s her.

Post # 7
2903 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: January 2011

Looks pretty modern to me

Post # 8
5720 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: November 2009 - New York, NY

It’s very pretty.

Leave a comment

Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

Find Amazing Vendors