Whose wedding ring was/is more expensive?

posted 3 years ago in Rings
  • poll: Whose wedding ring was/is more expensive?
    Mine is more expensive : (124 votes)
    73 %
    Ours are the same : (13 votes)
    8 %
    We bought a set : (0 votes)
    His/Theirs is more expensive : (27 votes)
    16 %
    I'm not having a ring, but he/they are : (3 votes)
    2 %
    I'm having a ring, but he/they aren't : (1 votes)
    1 %
    We're not having rings at all : (0 votes)
    Other (because I'm sure I'm missing something)! : (3 votes)
    2 %
  • Post # 3
    Member
    2687 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: September 2015 - Ketchum, ID

    @renwoman:  I’d… say that’s pretty normal. Most guys I know have something like a Tungsten ring, whereas the woman has a gold or gold/diamond ring. 

    Post # 4
    Member
    489 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: January 2015

    each of my wedding bands will be over $2kish, and I’m going to have one on either side plus a plain band and probably an eternity to wear when I don’t want to wear my full set, but his will be a custom platinum ring so his will be probably more expensive than any one of mine (except the eternity band) but alltogether mine are definitely more expensive.  

    Post # 5
    Member
    3722 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    DH’s ring was almost 3 times more than mine (and mine was custom made!)

    Post # 6
    Member
    7997 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: December 2013

    Mine is platinum with diamonds… his is tungsten. So yeah, mine costs more!

    Post # 7
    Member
    816 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: November 2013

    Yup, mine was 1,400 and his was 300. 🙂 He loves his, tho!

    Post # 8
    Member
    6525 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: September 2013

    @renwoman:  its pretty typical for the woman’s w-band to cost more. my DHs w-band was actually thrown in because DH got my e-ring and w-bad from him. So as a courtesy he threw in the w-band for DH and his was just a plain platinum band.

    Post # 9
    Member
    1093 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: May 2014

    Haha his is more than mine! I think I paid around 1k for his ring and he paid a little under 700.00 for mine

    Post # 10
    Member
    13019 posts
    Honey Beekeeper
    • Wedding: June 2011

    Mine was wy more… 1100 vs 45.

    Post # 11
    Member
    5932 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: April 2018

    @renwoman:  Mr. 99’s was far and away more expensive than mine, the thing is heavy, and thick and solid gold….it was double the cost of my thinner, channel set diamond eternity band.

    Post # 12
    Member
    2675 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: May 2014 - Madison, WI

    Mine will be much more – WG and diamond half eternity band versus his – Tungsten Carbide YG plated.

    Post # 13
    Hostess
    11469 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper

    Mine, by a landslide.

    Post # 14
    Member
    8426 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: April 2013

    Mine is almost three times more than what my husband’s cost.

     

    Post # 15
    Member
    3777 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: February 2013

    They were about the same actually! Mine had small diamonds, and cost around $750. His fingers are so small that the white gold band he chose ended up being around $700.

     

    Don’t mind the college rings, lol, this is the only photo on this comp with both bands.

     

     

    Post # 16
    Member
    11379 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: April 2012

    @renwoman:  if you are comparing the exact same ring just different sizes, his will usually be more expensive due to more gold (or metal).  women’s rings are more expensive when they include diamonds, or engravings, etc.

    my wband was way more than my dh’s b/c mine has diamonds.

    Leave a comment


    Sent weekly. You may unsubscribe at any time.

    Find Amazing Vendors