(Closed) Advice needed for wedding timeline

posted 4 years ago in Reception
Post # 3
Member
7871 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: November 1999

@Skittles131:  Where are the photos in the 2nd option? It seems to me it only saves an hour because there’s no time for photos.

Also I’m not a fan of a receiving line, but that’s up to you. I think it’s much better to go from table to table after dinner at the reception – you’re not really going to be dancing for 3-4 hours are you?

Post # 4
Member
182 posts
Blushing bee

On option 2, are there still cocktails? I am not a fan of the recieving line either… 

I would do:

4 ceremony

5 cocktails/ pictures

6 dinner

 

Post # 5
Member
1101 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2014

it all goes so fast, so if it ends at 10 pm, I would have the ceremony at 3 (or the more traditional 3:30pm), then cocktail hour, then dinner – with photos during cocktail hour.  I think you’ll be glad that you have the extra celebratory time.  

Two hours for dinner is too long I think too.  I would I open up dancing after 1 hour.  That way guests that were first through the line will have something to do.  

The topic ‘Advice needed for wedding timeline’ is closed to new replies.

Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

Find Amazing Vendors