Post # 1
Having a heck of a time deciding between these two dresses! With the allure 2853 I can choose whatever belt I want and have a long veil with lace trim (it’s only 1000 for the dress!). The Lazaro 3557 ($3600) is just so dreamy but I’ll be more limited in veil choice and won’t have a sparkly belt (which I love). I haven’t seen anyone else in either dress. Decisions, decisions! What do yall think?
Post # 2
They are both very beautiful! I love the frst one on you. Stunning!
Post # 3
- Wedding: November 2009 - New York, NY
My vote is for the Allure, it looks amazing on you.
Post # 4
- Wedding: June 2016 - Villa in Florence, Italy
I have a Lazaro….I personally think you can’t beat how soft and feminine his dresses are. But I am biased : ) to me the allure is not super memorable.
Post # 6
Lazaro! That is simply gorgeous – you look radiant. Plus the champagne color is so special on you.
Post # 7
Gosh – and the bodice
of the Lazaro is exquisite.
Post # 8
I also have a Lazaro so I’m probably biased, but I think it’s gorgeous! I also love the color and the bodice is to die for!! Haleyz said it best, the allure is not super memorable.
Post # 9
I think the allure looks better on you.
Post # 10
I like the allure on you . I lije the lace and I prefer the softer less plungy neckline
Post # 11
First picture of the white dress….love it on you way more than the second.
Post # 12
I like the Lazaro better, I agree with the prior posters, the Allure is pretty, but the Lazaro is stunning. On the Lazaro, I like the cut of the sweetheart better, overall it’s just more of a luxurious dress and I think it flatters you more.
Post # 13
My vote is for the allure. It’s so striking.
Post # 14
Thanks y’all! Here are some more pics!
Post # 15
- Wedding: April 2017 - The Waterfall
I vote for the allure. It looks stunning!