(Closed) Another bride who needs photography help…

posted 10 years ago in Photos/Videos
  • poll: Which one?




  • Post # 3
    10360 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: September 2010

    What is your wedding timeline? 6 hours doesn’t sound like it would cover everything. When you have a say, 30 min ceremony and 5 hour reception when were you planning on doing group photos? What about getting ready shots?

    Post # 4
    504 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: October 2010

    I would definitely say #2 is the most creative.  I could be wrong, but it seems like #1 and #3 rely mostly on editing (which is fine) but there isn’t as much of a natural eye as #2.  Which is kind of cool because you get 8 hours with that package and a magazine proof book.

    I wouldn’t worry about the 6 hours, though.  We have our photographer for 6 hours and we are taking all of our group photos before the ceremony (1pm-3pm) our family photos and b&g photos after the ceremony (4pm-5pm) and then we will still have the photographer for the first two hours of the reception.  We plan on getting all of the special things like first dance, toasts, tosses and cake cutting done within the first hour so she will have time to take some candid shots around the reception.

    Post # 5
    41 posts

    I like #2’s style.

    Post # 6
    26 posts
    • Wedding: June 2011

    I really like number 2. They are all good but the photos just seem clearer and more fun and it is definitely the best deal 🙂

    The topic ‘Another bride who needs photography help…’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors