(Closed) Are 6 meal options too much??

posted 10 years ago in Food
Post # 3
117 posts
Blushing bee

I have to agree with your parents, more options is always better than less options, (especially if there is no extra cost).

Post # 4
311 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: October 2008

If it’s a restaurant, do they need to know people’s choices ahead of time?  I think if so, 3 is plenty.  If people can choose the night of, then maybe I’d offer more since it wouldn’t be much hassle for you.

Post # 5
16 posts
  • Wedding: December 1969

Speaking as a picky eater , I always thought 4 options would be a good number – beef/red meat, chicken, seafood, vegetarian.  I’m all for more choices!  And if you’re looking to save space on an RSVP, perhaps you could use little icons instead of words or descriptions (cow, chicken, etc.).

Post # 7
796 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: April 2009

I think that looks great! The little icons you chose for the meal options are really cute, too.

Post # 8
332 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: May 2009

Due to budget, we don’t have any options, but I echo <span class=”postby”> gemini606: beef, chicken, fish, and veggie options would be ideal. There’s really no need for more, if you even need that many.

Post # 9
1205 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: May 2009

Looks wonderful. I always appreciate a good veggie option 🙂

Sounds like this is decided, but I would factor in how many people will be having meals. Fewer people = fewer choices needed or expected. 

The topic ‘Are 6 meal options too much??’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors