(Closed) Article from the Atlantic about the history, marketing and pricing of diamonds.

posted 6 years ago in Rings
Post # 3
Member
7992 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: July 2013 - UK

I remember reading a sociology book about weddings recently, which contained a lot of this information, so i’m not surprised. It would be interesting to read an update on this article though, as it was written in 1982.

I think the saddest thing is that even though I know so much about weddings is artificially created ******** designed to make us pay for stuff in the name of “sentiment”… I still want it 🙁

Post # 4
Member
334 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: August 2012

Thanks for sharing this insightful article. It would be interesting to read a follow-up article on how things have developed since the 80s.

Post # 5
Member
1838 posts
Buzzing bee

I have often wondered what makes a diamond more ‘forever’ than a sapphire or a ruby… technicly speaking a diamond will still eventually degrade over time (millions of years) in to a chunk of carbon or graphite.

I think that means technically graphite is forever? we should all we walking around with mechanical pencil lead on our rings from now on?

Post # 6
Member
1595 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: May 2013

Makes me glad that my boyfriend bought a preowned ring, orginally purchased for $31,000 (by the original owner) for $18500.

Post # 7
Member
135 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: February 2012

Very interesting. I knew that diamonds were valuable just because people have forced value onto them. I originally wanted a moissanite ring but when I received it..yuck. So I got a diamond from the pawn shop and I LOVE IT. Diamonds are still pretty, even if they are worthless 🙂

@Dell79:  Wow, that’s still quite a purchase! Must be gorgeous.

Post # 8
Member
4371 posts
Honey bee

Such an interesting article!

The topic ‘Article from the Atlantic about the history, marketing and pricing of diamonds.’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors