Post # 17
???… If she wanted the band look instead of a traditional engagement ring I think that just the most extravagant of the bands would have been sufficient…
But ok. If she loves it for herself, that I love it for her.
(Although I can’t help but notice that it takes up all of the space on that finger. Wedding band goes where?)
Post # 18
- Wedding: April 2013 - Rhode Island
I think it’s very pretty, but it doesn’t scream “engaged” or “married” to me.
Post # 19
- Wedding: April 2013 - A court...
I like them all except for the second one with the emeralds
Post # 20
Definitely a bit much! I’m surprised she can lift her hand! I like the concept, sure, but just, no.
Post # 21
i think i just like the large band by itself.
Post # 22
to each their own…..it’s not for me though and it really doesn’t even look like a wedding set, seems messy to me. If that’s what she wanted though and she’s happy with it that’s all that matters.
Post # 23
@Miss Joker: That’s one ring? I don’t get it. To me, it looks like bulky costume jewelry. I don’t watch the show, but I’ve heard enough about it to know they probably won’t need to worry about a wedding ring for very long.
Post # 25
Wait, that’s tasteful? I must not know what that word means.
That being said, I adore the 2nd from the top band. Are those emeralds?
Post # 26
Looks like Henry Daussi bands.
Post # 27
@Miss Joker: I find it hideously and obnoxiously gaudy. few stacks really speak to me, but this is really displeasing to my eye.
Post # 28
It looks ridiculous and gaudy. Like costume jewellery.
Post # 29
Hm.. I think an engagement ring should be just that.. A ring. Not four.
I think it’s really over the top and not really pretty at all. The rings are pretty by themselves, but not all together like that.
Post # 30
Some stacks can look very beautiful, but when it goes all the way up to your knuckle? No.
Post # 31
It looks like she will have a hard time bending her finger, haha. It’s not my taste…but I guess that’s why the make vanilla and chocolate.