(Closed) Belt or no belt on wedding dress

posted 3 years ago in Dress
  • poll: Belt or no belt
    Belt : (28 votes)
    43 %
    No belt : (37 votes)
    57 %
  • Post # 2
    Member
    309 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: June 2015

    Well your dress has a lot of detail and visual interest (which mine does too I think) and a lot of people said no belt on mine, but I voted yes just because I love sashes on wedding gowns. It helps define the waist and they just add that extra something thatbmskes it YOURS. It all depends on your preference though 🙂 there are people who love sashes and those who don’t so I’d do what you love 🙂

    Although pretty much NO ONE likes my belt, I am still wearing it because I love it anyways 🙂 lol

    Post # 3
    Member
    1911 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: December 2014

    Def belt. Helps give you a waist & breaks up the dress some (in a good way) 

    Post # 4
    Member
    556 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: October 2014

    This is a hard one.  I love the belt but like previous comment states there is a lot going on. So I vote no belt.  Ur dress is gorgeous! ! 

    Post # 5
    Member
    2125 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: June 2015

    Yes to the belt! It defines your waist and emphasizes your great figure. 

    Post # 6
    Member
    8704 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: September 2013

    Belt is a must IMO

    Post # 7
    Member
    70 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: August 2014

    Yes belt – it almost echoes the trim above where the skirt flares, and defines your waist beautifully – show it off! What’s the dress? I’m really liking the design in general.

    Post # 8
    Member
    366 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: December 2014

    I voted sash, definitely. I think it finishes off your dress, and as a pp said almost echoes the detailing at the bottom of your dress. x

    Post # 9
    Member
    41 posts
    Newbee

    Definitely no! You’ve already got a band around your hips and another one at the bust. It breaks up your body too much.

    Post # 11
    Member
    86 posts
    Worker bee

    Yes to a belt as it does define your small waist, but not this belt. It’s too similar to the band at your hips IMO. I would go with one that’s a different shape, one that tapers off on the ends.

    Post # 12
    Member
    1737 posts
    Bumble bee

    srarmstr:  I voted no belt, because I think it breaks up your body into too many pieces. The dress already has a horizontal “line” where the bodice ends and the skirt starts, so I think I belt competes with that detailing. I also like the simpler lines that the dress has without the belt. Your waist is already obviously tiny, and the dress already had enough detailing and bling that a belt doesn’t add much for me. It doesn’t take away a lot either, but I think the first photo is less busy and more visually appealing than the second IMO.

    Post # 13
    Member
    1928 posts
    Buzzing bee

    Def NO belt! You already have a band around your hips and adding the belt divides you up into 3 sections.

    Post # 14
    Member
    12 posts
    Newbee

    I voted no belt. You have have beautiful shape and the dress is structured well to show it off aldready.

    Post # 15
    Member
    46 posts
    Newbee
    • Wedding: April 2015

    It looks good both ways but I think I prefer no belt a little more. The dress has enough sparkle on it’s own you don’t need it for that and I think the belt kind of takes away from the dress. And it hides your waist. Your so thin the dress shows off your curves better without it.

    The topic ‘Belt or no belt on wedding dress’ is closed to new replies.

    Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
    I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

    Find Amazing Vendors