(Closed) Blake Livelys stunner- what do you think?

posted 9 years ago in Rings
Post # 32
Member
3016 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: December 2011

It’s beautiful design-wise, but looks super cloudy for some reason?? Maybe just the photo…

Post # 33
Member
4005 posts
Honey bee

While it’s not particularly my style, I think it’s gorgeous. 

Post # 34
Member
420 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: April 2013

love it!

Post # 35
Member
3683 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: November 2012

I think the ring itself looks a bit disproportionate.  I like the setting, I like the stone, but I don’t think they compliment each other very well.  It would be perfect if there was 30% less stone or 30% more band.

Post # 36
Member
2812 posts
Sugar bee

It’s definitely not my style as I don’t like paper thin bands like that but the diamond I think is gorgeous… BIG but it’s expected from a celebrity like her. I love the rose gold. I am very happy for them and wish them many years together and babies 🙂

ScarJo messed up.. too bad LOL

Post # 37
Member
372 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2012

I really love it.  Even the size it is. This picture makes it look a little bigger and more over-the-top than I think it really is.  I have seen other pics where it is actually pretty proportional to her hand and even, if I dare say, “dainty.”  Love the rose gold, and the pave.  While it is a thin setting with a huge stone the profile looks low and comfortable and the color of the diamond is pink without being too pink.  I don’t even usually like oval cut and I still adore it.

Post # 38
Member
1735 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: October 2011

I absolutley love it! I think if it were a tad bit smaller, it would be more asthetically pleasing, but other than that, I think its perfect. I can see why he would get bigger, because he could afford it, and perhaps thats the size she thinks looks best.

Post # 39
Member
1410 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: February 2014

I LOVE ovals (and am hoping to get one of my own soon) but I think this is just too big. It looks so strange with such a thin band, and then this massive stone on top. The wedding band just looks awkward as well. I’d like to see the underside of it, to check out how the heck they fastened that rock onto the band.

I like the setting I picked out way more, this is just… ugly.

Post # 40
Member
3457 posts
Sugar bee

@KatyElle:  ITA. I like the style but the stone looks not clear.

Post # 41
Member
1331 posts
Bumble bee

I think it’s too giant and too oval!

Post # 42
Member
707 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: November 1999

I would’ve liked it more were the band thicker, simpler, and the oval diamond were going side to side or east-west instead of up and down or north-south the way it does now.

Post # 43
Member
29 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: April 2012

Not quite my style.  I have to agree with some of you, it does look cloudy, but that can very well be the pic, and the setting is too thin.  I do wish them lots of happiness though.  After all, that’s what matters most.

Post # 45
Member
537 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: November 2012

I never thought I’d say this, but, I wish it was smaller.  I’d like it much more.

Post # 46
Member
3457 posts
Sugar bee

I had no idea it was a light pink diamond. I love it even more!

The topic ‘Blake Livelys stunner- what do you think?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors