(Closed) Brides with no train… did you miss it?

posted 9 years ago in Dress
  • poll: Wedding dresses without trains: What do you think?

    A train takes it from "white dress" to "bridal gown"

    A dress can still look very bridal without a train

  • Post # 3
    7172 posts
    Busy Beekeeper

    That is a beautiful dress!  My dress had a slight train, but I would not have missed it if it wasn’t there.  I think you will still feel very bridal in your dress.  But, I’m of the opinion a train is not what makes a dress bridal!

    Post # 4
    869 posts
    Busy bee

    I’m having a hard time deciding this as well!!!  Initially I was looking for a dress without one, but the dress I ended up ordering has one.  We’ll see…I’m interested in seeing what the other brides have to say, thanks for posting!

    Post # 5
    827 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2012

    I think that that dress will look fine without a train.

    Post # 6
    68 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: May 2012

    That dress is gorgeous! I can see how a bustle would completely change the charm of it, and with being out doors you don’t want to worry about the length.

    Its a gorgeous dress, you’ll have your name on the invitations, no one is going to wonder who the bride is. 

    Post # 7
    9024 posts
    Buzzing Beekeeper
    • Wedding: June 2011

    My dress has a very short chapel train that barely looked like a train because of the tiered skirt of my dress but I had a cathedral veil for the ceremony with a metallic edge so that really took it up a notch.



    Post # 9
    174 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: October 2011

    I didn’t have a train and don’t regret it!  I still felt like a bride and no one mentioned the lack of train.  My wedding was also outside, so a train would have just got in the way.

    The topic ‘Brides with no train… did you miss it?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors