(Closed) buffet or sit down meal?

posted 8 years ago in Food
  • poll: buffet or sit down meal

    buffet

    sit down meal

  • Post # 18
    Member
    1430 posts
    Bumble bee

    I did buffet. Depending on how many guests you have I feellike buffett is quicker. My friends wedding was sit down and the head table was completely done eating before more people even got their food.

    Post # 19
    Member
    23591 posts
    Honey Beekeeper
    • Wedding: September 2011

    I’m more a fan of the plated.  I don’t really prefer the disorganization of lines and people getting their own food.  Buffet is totally fine, I just prefer plated!

    Post # 20
    Member
    354 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: November 2012

    I prefer buffet for the variety, and the ability to control how much of each dish you get.  For instance, with a plated meal, I often cannot eat the side dish or the main dish (lactose intolerant and there are always creamy sides!).  So I’m usually still hungry by the end of the meal.  With a buffet, I can just get more of whatever item I can eat.  And I like the option for seconds 🙂  As for the waiting element, I find that you have to wait for plated food too – you just wait till they decide to serve you.  To avoid waiting in line, I like buffets where one or two tables are asked to use the buffet at a time – controls the line situation better. 

    Post # 21
    Member
    804 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: August 2014

    I voted sit down meal, but due to circumstances beyond our control were having a buffet (though it’s still going to be a sit down buffet after all the guests have served themselves. 

    The topic ‘buffet or sit down meal?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors