(Closed) Buffet vs Sit Down for large wedding worth the cost savings?

posted 8 years ago in Money
Post # 3
Member
3219 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: November 2010

They would never make it so the last person wouldnt get food. In a buffet they make the number of servings per dish the same as # of guests. not that number total.

With a large wedding like that they might do 2 lines and or 2 tables

I personally like buffets more then sit downs because the food is fresher and you get more options

Post # 4
Member
1927 posts
Buzzing bee

I foresee this being a disaster.  I’m not a fan of buffet dinners anyway (I just think they are far less elegant than a sit down).  But for a wedding this big I just don’t think it’s possible.  You would basically have to have at least two full set ups with a line going through on either side.  Three or four set ups if there are servers at the buffet.  Otherwise, it would take all night just for everyone to get food.

Post # 5
Member
1418 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: July 2011

I can’t say from experience….but I had that worry too with respect to a buffet!  However, at our venue, the cost of the plated dinner versus the buffet dinner was pretty much the same (within a few dollars).  We went with the plated dinner for convenience.

I wanted to mention though that a few of the venues I checked out would only serve a plated dinner if the guest list was greater than 100-120 guests (because of space constraints – for the buffet table and the line), so make sure you ask the question just in case!

Edit:  I was also told that as a venue they only have a certain timeframe to complete dinner – due to health and safety regulations with respect to serving food – so that was another reason that the buffet was restricted to smaller events.

Post # 6
Hostess
16194 posts
Honey Beekeeper

I’ve been to many buffet weddings, some with large guest lists, and it’s never been a big problem. The venue staff usually keeps things moving pretty well. And I promise, the venue will have extra food, so you won’t run out.

I also have to counter the “buffets aren’t elegant” concept. Sure, it’s nicer to have someone serve food. But a buffet in an elegant venue can still be elegant. And I’d much rather save thousands of dollars than worry about guests’ perception of buffet vs. sitdown.

Post # 7
Member
3709 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

It depends on how you do the buffet. If the set-up is like a cafeteria in that everyone is served from one line, I can see a potential for problems. However, if you have multiple stations set up, it’s possible that everyone will make it through one of the stations quickly and be seated without messing up your timeline.

Post # 8
Member
8353 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: March 2011

I suggest having two buffet stations set up with the same items. The lines will move faster that way. Also, make a menu for your guests, so they can see what is being served. They will know what they want before they get to the buffet, so that will make the lines go faster too.

Post # 9
Member
1995 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

I’ve been to large wedding where this happened.  We were first to get our food and we were done before people got their’s.  Its no big deal.  We went to the bar, chatted, hung out, went to the bathroom, watched the flower girls dance.  I don’t think too many people will be upset!

Post # 11
Member
687 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: June 2011

I’ve been to far more weddings with buffets than with plated dinners (it’s a midwest thing I think) — like Rgeddy said above, it’s never been a big deal to finish early, or wait a while to get in the line… that’s what the bar, and good friends are there for!  🙂  We are expecting around 350 and will having a buffet dinner.  To help speed things up we will have a servers at the buffet so as a guest walks through the line the food they choose is placed on their plate by a server that way they don’t have to juggle plates/serving utensils and we have more control over the portions.

Hope this is helpful!

Post # 12
Member
1518 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: September 2010

We are doing a sit down dinner and we have 211 people coming. Mainly just because the way the venue is set up and it would be hard to have everyone moving around that much.. and our dancing area/bar is in another area of the venue. 

I think buffets are fine because like @Rgeddy said people will be talking and getting drinks etc. I would make sure there are at least two lines for the bar and food. and give people plenty of time to finish eating so they don’t feel rushed. One way you can do this as the B&G is to get your food brought to you 1st, finish eating, then go and greet the guests table by table. Oh and if you are showing up after the people are already there.. let them start to get your food before you two arrive. 

Post # 13
Member
5388 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: December 2010

We are having a buffet with about 400 people coming. There will be multiple lines, so many servers per guest, and people will get up by table. So it will be done in an organized way (which is key to buffet lines). We will also have menus available.

Post # 14
Member
401 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: July 2011

I have been to wedding with both and to be honest a sit down served meal is far more elegant and stays withing your time restarints.  with the buffet people were walking around back and forth wit plates in their hand to be honest it was kaotic. I think buffets are good for under 100 guests anything more and it becomes a huge mess.

Post # 16
Member
3176 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

My cousin had about 350 people and it was a buffet. There were two lines, plenty of food and it wasn’t bad at all. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with a buffet at a wedding.

The topic ‘Buffet vs Sit Down for large wedding worth the cost savings?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors