(Closed) Can't decide! Torn between 2 moissy wedding sets

posted 4 years ago in Rings
  • poll: 3 stone or more simple?
    three stone bling : (26 votes)
    35 %
    simply beautiful : (48 votes)
    65 %
  • Post # 2
    317 posts
    Helper bee

    Well, I’m voting simply on personal preference.  I am not too flashy, so I really like the simpler of the two.  Neither of them are simple though!! They are both gorgeous and detailed, but the 3 stone doesn’t personally fit me.  I’m also not a big fan of curved bands, so the straight band with the simpler one suits me.  It sounds like the 3 stone could really suit you, and it sounds like you really love it, so I really don’t think you can go wrong with either of these sets.  

    Post # 4
    1865 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: April 2006

    I love the profile of the simpler design. I think the other one is gorgeous too, but it’s a bit too busy in my opinion. I like the fact that the simpler design isn’t really all that simple, it’s just intricate and unique enough to have the perfect balance.

    Post # 6
    2299 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: September 2013

    Definitely the single halo.  The three stone has way to much going on.

    Post # 8
    10596 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: December 2013

    I typically don’t care for 3 stones but I really like that one! I like the single halo too but that style is becoming so common. The 3 stone is more unique. 

    Post # 10
    156 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: September 2015

    As much as I would love to say the three stone, I’m with everyone else on going simpler. 

    But then, is it going to be the only ring, or do you have a separate band as well?

    The topic ‘Can't decide! Torn between 2 moissy wedding sets’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors