Post # 1
Anyone been to either of these!? I’m going to Vegas, and we want some entertainment, more on the naughty side,,,anyone have any advice? I’ve heard they’re both good, I’ll be going with a group of 11 girls. Thanks for any advice!
Post # 3
According to The Unofficial Guide to Las Vegas-my favorite guidebook-they’re both good, but if you’ve got people who are easily made uncomfortable Thunder from Down Under is more conservative. It got 3 stars. Chippendales gets 4 stars and they describe it as "the ultimate ladies’ night out." It is full frontal nudity. That book makes Chippendales sound more fun. If you want, PM me, and I’ll scan in the whole reviews for you.
Post # 4
My sister just went to the Chippendale’s show in June and she said there no frontal at all, so maybe there are different options for the shows?
Post # 5
We went to Thunder from Down Under when I went to a bachelorette party in Vegas and it was a lot of fun – though I haven’t seen Chippendale’s so I can’t really compare. They got most of the bachelorette’s up on stage at some point too.
Post # 6
There is no frontal at the Chippendale’s show but they do show firm butts! 🙂 Actually, they pull off their thongs/boxer briefs while they are facing away from the audience and you may catch a shadow of their package from between their legs but that’s about it. They do pull women up onto the stage if you’re into getting the full attention but I think it’s all done in a tasteful manner.
Post # 6
I’ve seen both shows–and both were good! Chippendales definitely had the better dancers, but Thunder had a lot more audience interaction. 🙂