(Closed) Creation story and the dinosaurs?

posted 5 years ago in Christian
Post # 3
4895 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: October 2018

Behemoths and great beasts are mentioned in Job chapter 40. I think they’re mentioned elsewhere as well.


You could also note that it’s mentioned that a human day is a blink to God (2 Peter 3:8 is a good one) so the Creation could’ve taken 7 “God days” and not 7 “Human days”. He was the one who invented the definition of a “day”… He’s God. He’s not limited by hours and days like we are and try to do to Him.  So, in the Creation story where God is creating animals, dinosaurs would be included as well. One “God day” would therefore be thousands upon thousands of human years, thus giving dinosaurs time to live and die off before humans were created in the end. 




Post # 4
3567 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: September 2013

When I did consider myself a Christian I asked my preacher about an explaination of where the dinosaurs fit in.  His response was “our duty as a Christian is to not question, but believe.”

A while later, after deciding I was not a Christian, I had a converstation with a former co-worker who was also a preacher.  He couldn’t give an answer about the dinosaurs either, but offered the theory that the “great beasts” in the Bible were dinosaurs.  

Like you, I also believe in evolutionary theory…my scientific mind needs proof of anything otherwise.

I look forward to seeing other’s beliefs on the matter!

Post # 6
463 posts
Helper bee

All the Christians I know accept the archeological evidence that plants and animals have changed over hundreds of millions of years.

People in biblical times didn’t really have the same modern empirical distinction between metaphorically true vs. provably true. So modern people tend to get really caught up in trying to figure out which parts of the Bible fall where in that distinction, even though that question wouldn’t mean the same thing to ancient people. In a way it’s a literary question – most modern people have a really hard time with the literary paradigm of the Bible, although we can understand in our own literary paradigm that a modern book, say about WWII, is factually true even if it has a metaphor like “The Germans marched across Europe with the boots of giants.” It would probably be clear to ancient Hebrews which parts of the Bible are more or less of what we call literal, but it isn’t to us.

To understand the Bible I think you have to understand literature and history somewhat. But all the Christians I know agree that God wants them to use their reason as much as possible to understand the world. That includes acknowledging reasonable scientific evidence.

I think your Fiance should read the theologian Thomas Aquinas – he thought a lot about how faith and reason interact and are compatible. He was very much not OK with the idea of believing things that are contrary to reason.

Post # 7
10573 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: January 2011

Personally, I’m not a fan of religions that don’t encourage questions.  Darling Husband was raised Catholic, but that was a major reason as to why he isn’t anymore.


Some stories in the bible are that, stories.  Yes, I do find meaning in them, but don’t take everything literally.


Also, things could only be written at the level of knowledge at the time.  People weren’t going to understand genetics when there was no knowledge about genes, DNA, etc.


Post # 8
1737 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: September 2013

My Christian Fiance likes to say (only half-joking) that dinosaurs were “Earth Beta.” Like, God created the animals, including the dinosaurs, then decided for whatever reason that these giant lizards needed to be destroyed. Adam and Eve came afterwards.

Post # 9
1471 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: November 2013

I used to be a young earth creationist Christian. At that time we were taught that humans and dinosaurs coexisted, and were the animals mentioned in Job. We were also taught that animals in mythology (dragons etc) were examples of dinosaurs.


Then I realized science didn’t match creationism, no matter how hard I tried to make it, so ended up as a theistic evolutionist for a while, but would now consider myself agnostic.

Post # 11
463 posts
Helper bee

@hollyberry4:  That’s such a shame! I’m agnostic/atheist but I was raised Catholic, and my parents had the completely opposite viewpoint. They wanted me to ask theological questions.

I would definitely recommend to your Fiance that he read more theology. Not sure what he likes to read, but maybe Thomas Aquinas isn’t the best suggestion to start with, since his writing is difficult to follow. I’d recommend getting a synopsis of his work instead… but I brought it up because TA is practically part of Catholic orthodoxy, and he says Catholics are supposed to use their reason and ask questions. So, if some Catholics are saying the opposite, they need to get with their own theology!

There’s so much interesting theological stuff out there, as you know from the class you took. You’re certainly not the only one to notice philosophical problems presented by Christianity – people have spent 2000 years writing about them! If you look in the right place, I think there’s something for everyone. Without knowing what he likes, I might start with C.S. Lewis – his writing style is really engaging and he has both fiction and nonfiction work.

Post # 12
11357 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: May 2009

I’m an evangelical, Bible-believing Christian, and, although I am extremely analytical and very logic-based in my thinking — and I have attended only public schools and earned both my bachelor’s and master’s degrees from public, secular universities — I absolutely believe in creation and intelligent design.

I am not at all afraid of science, because I believe that all  truth is God’s truth.  However, I strongly believe that human knowledge is limited and incomplete. We only know what we know, and the rest is, at best, a theory based on what we do know, not what we do not know. Only God is all knowing and has every answer.

I absolutely believe that there are theories that many humans believe to be true — based upon the information that they have now — that simply are not true.  We just do not know that they’re not true yet, and we may never know until we meet the Lord. There have been many medical and scientific theories over the years that have later been disproven when new and more comprehensive information is available or additional evidence is revealed.

As a Christian, I believe it is arrogant and prideful, not to mention a bit ridiculous, for human beings (the creation) to try to tell God (our Creator) why what His Word says is true cannot be true simply because we  have not yet found a manner in which to prove that it is true and such concepts are, at present, incomprehensible to us.

I honestly do not know the answers to some questions, and Scripture makes very clear that “now we know in part,” but, when we meet the Lord, then we shall know in full.

Post # 13
286 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2013

I agree that Gods days aren’t necessarily the same time frame of our days. I think god either created them and then planned for them to go extinct for the process of evolution (or gods creation of man) to happen or they survived the creation of man and then when god flooded the earth (this is when maybe the continents split) the dinasours were not destined to be saved so died in the flood.


these are just my crazy thoughts that go through my head at night when god and I take talking

Post # 14
5547 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: December 2011

I’ve had this conversation with people before (totally putting my.foot in my mouth taking to my boss’s wife) because I believe that science and religion aren’t ar odds and that while God created the world and all the natural processes that allow it to function, it is not perhaps as literal as some people, especially some young earth creationists would believe. Days didn’t exist in the same idea we have as 24 hours because the sun wasn’t there to revolve around yet.

A speaker I heard once made a good point about it,  the Bible wasn’t and isn’t intended to be a science ttextbook,  its a book of theology and I don’t believe God would allow us as as humans to have such a deep desire to understand science if He didn’t want us to try. They aren’t opposites science just hasn’t caught up to God. 

Also random side note,  totally think (in a completely unscientific way) the levathin is a dragon. It is huge,  scaly and breaths fire. Or at least smoke. Come on,  what crocodile breathes fire? !? Plus the ancient people could kill crocs and hippos if they really had to,  they weren’t quite so epic.

Post # 15
691 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: June 2013

I believe when people meet God, he or she will say “Wow, you people really screwed up my whole message!” 


The topic ‘Creation story and the dinosaurs?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors