Memberwould you reccomend this diamond? I don’t have photos yet but here are the specs!
.90
i colour
vs2
ideal cut
clarity characteristics: cloud, Crystal, indented natural
also no florescence
621x627x380mm
60.9 %depth
60 %table
excellent polish
very good symmetry
Memberseems like a good diamond but kinda hard without seeing it.
MemberMemberits graded by GIA i don’t mind the I but according to the depth and face percent I hope it’s a good option
Member
MemberMemberWould a vs2 be clean to the naked eye though?
MemberWhat are the crown and pavilion angles? http://www.pricescope.com/tools/hca
It’s a 60/60 diamond, which some people love and some people don’t. http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/news/6060-ideal-cut-diamond/
Memberhttp://www.pricescope.com/wiki/diamonds/60-60-proportioned-diamond
As cmbr indicated, Without knowing the other angles, it’s almost impossible to say. A 60/60 diamond could perform very well, or not so well. The GIA rated it “ideal” cut, but their parameters for that are a lot looser than some other labs.
MemberMember
MemberMemberThe other diamond option I have has similar specs But priced 200 dollars more:
.90, ideal cut, 610 X 616 X 387, everything else same as the previous diamonds except also has a “feather” in the characteristics of clarity.
would the 57 % table And 63.2 % table be a better option than 60/60 ?
MemberMemberI would absolutely not buy that first diamond. You can run the numbers through the calculator yourself, but it scores a 5.7 on the HCA. Anything under 2 is ideal. I understand that not everyone is in the market for a superideal diamond, but that one really doesn’t score well.
The topic ‘Diamond advice’ is closed to new replies.
