(Closed) Do I have to bustle my wedding dress?

posted 9 years ago in Dress
Post # 3
2969 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: February 2012

If you’re not dancing and you’re opposed to bustles then I don’t see the harm, you’ll just have to remember to be careful when walking around so no one steps on it by accident or so you don’t trip. The only reason I think bustles are truly necessary is if you are dancing, but as you said, you aren’t. 

Post # 4
5229 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: March 2012 - Pelican Grand Beach Resort

I think you can leave it unbustled if it is important to you, but there are some things to consider, even if you aren’t dancing. Be very careful about people stepping on your dress. It happens a lot, and it can ruin the dress if the fabric gets pulled too much. 

Regarding the fabric, it can be bustled. A seamstress will know which types of bustle are appropriate for your dress. You may want to consider a ballroom bustle, which folds the train under the skirt to make it look like there was no train at all.

Post # 5
697 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: September 2013

My friend had a dress that had just the bottom half of the train that was tulle so the seamstress told her she couldn’t bustle (top half was satin).  She carried her train, but then after dinner, she changed into a reception dress so she could dance.

The topic ‘Do I have to bustle my wedding dress?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors