Post # 1
What would you consider the style? Sexy, Classic, beautiful, modest?
Do you think that the dress is too sexy? revealing?
Does the dress look cheap, especially with the illusion back?
Some of tue buttons on the back are broken but the dress otself is ordered.
Post # 2
Nothing about this dress says “cheap” or “too revealing”! Maybe I’ve become numb to the illusion back after seeing so many of them, but they’re really rather common these days so they don’t have that shock value of being nearly backless. The cap sleaves and details come off as sweet to me, not sexy.
The dress also looks to be of high quailty – I’ve seen some bad illusion work on dresses before, but this looks on par with the big name dresses many people on here get (not sure what label your dress is) like Allure, Wtoo, etc…
Edited to add: Congrats on finding your dress! Should have started with that lol. Also, I’m sure you’ll feel like a million bucks once it arrives in your size and you can have it altered to fit like a glove. It’s a lovely dress!
Post # 3
classic from front, sexy from back. not a fan of the ribbon but it’s fine. Nowadays you see more revealing wedding dresses like lingerie inspired corsets and plunging necklines/backs, so I wouldn’t worry about illusions being “revealing and cheap”
Post # 4
Is this your dress? It’s very pretty, but it’s hard to answer your question without knowing where you’re coming from. Are you concerned that the back is too revealing? Where are you having the ceremony?
Post # 5
Thanks! we are having it at an old plantation style home. I was raised in the church so I know those people will be attending and thats why I was asking about the modesty! And we did not get the ribbon belt:)
Post # 6
Nope!!! Not cheap at all!! Beautiful!!
Post # 7
I don’t think “cheap” at all. It looks beautiful to me!
Post # 8
no not cheap. In fact the lace on the back covers a lot…if you were worried about that, but I wouldn’t be.