(Closed) ENG 952 or ENG 192 – Both round petite halo pave *add photos*

posted 6 years ago in Rings
  • poll: ENG 192 OR ENG 952 FROM MOISSANITECO
    ENG 192 : (24 votes)
    69 %
    ENG 952 : (11 votes)
    31 %
  • Post # 3
    Member
    307 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: December 2012

    pick what u like!

    Post # 4
    Member
    394 posts
    Helper bee

    Here is a thread with Eng952 (I am 90% getting this ring myself)

    http://boards.weddingbee.com/topic/does-any-one-have-ring-eng952-from-moissaniteco

     

    Eng192 – also very lovely…very similar.

    http://boards.weddingbee.com/topic/moissanitecocom-anyone-have-this-ring-round-brilliant-moissanite-petite-halo

     

    I believe the major difference is one has an actual diamond halo, while the other is moissanite. I could be mistaken though?

    Post # 5
    Member
    1 posts
    Wannabee

    I don’t have either of these rings, but I have my eye on 192. I believe 952 has actual diamonds down the sides and on the halo, but they are slightly included diamonds so they are a bit cheaper than the moissy stones that are down the sides and on the halo of 192. Slightly included basically means they have imperfections…some examples could be clouding, cleavage, discoloration, etc…but they are so tiny that I doubt anyone would notice. 

    The topic ‘ENG 952 or ENG 192 – Both round petite halo pave *add photos*’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors