(Closed) Engagement photos – necessary or not?

posted 5 years ago in Photos/Videos
Post # 2
9519 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper

Totally not necessary

Post # 3
457 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: August 2017

View original reply
bcbride17 :  nah surely you don’t need those. Get someone to take lots of snaps of you both to help you relax for the big day. X 

Post # 4
999 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: March 2017

Not at all, especially since you already had engagement photos taken. See if your photographer will meet you instead to get to know you better.

We had our engagement photos taken and didn’t like the photographer at all so I switched. The new photographer is working with us and will trade the engagement session that is included in her package for a bridal shoot instrad, but she does want to meet for lunch so she can get to know us better since we opted out of a second engagement shoot.

Post # 5
542 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: July 2017

Not necessary but….we used ours as our save the date!

Post # 6
2119 posts
Buzzing bee

I think it d lends on you as a couple. I’m really really awkward in front of a camera so for me, yes, it is a necessity. But if you’re a more ‘go with the flow’ kinda person then it probably isn’t needed at all. 

Post # 7
97 posts
Worker bee

I wish I hadn’t skipped the engagement photos. I might have gone in a different direction with the photographer. I was really disappointed with my wedding photos. It’s a good opportunity for you to get comfortable with your photographer and lessens the chance of any surprises when you see your wedding photos.

Post # 8
7881 posts
Bumble Beekeeper

Engagement photos are purely supplemental. They’re just another thing that the wedding industry came up with. You don’t absolutely need them to be engaged or married. 

Post # 9
431 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2017 - Country Cottage and Gardens

I think a lot of the purpose is to get more comfortable but more so with the general concept of being photographed. So really you already accomplished that even if it wasn’t with that specific photographer. I don’t really see another shoot adding to that practice. I would just ask if they could meet for coffee to get to know them a little better.

Post # 10
699 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: February 2019

Not at all necessary!!

Post # 11
4695 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: September 2014

Not necessary at all. We only did them because they were part of our photography package.. They were more of a hassle than anything, we ended up squeezing them in about 2 weeks before our wedding.

We got some great pics but, I personally find them silly and wouldn’t have done them if they weren’t part of our package.

Post # 12
858 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: December 2016

No necessary but I found it helpful for us because we had never been professionally photographed before. Now we feel more prepared for the day of!

Post # 13
228 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: City, State

Like PP said before, I thought it was a silly concept at first but it came with our package and we ended up getting awesome pictures of us in non-wedding attire and used them for our save the dates so I’m happy we did it. It also allowed us to get comfortable with the photographer and being photographed in a low stress environment. You’ve already done some, I say skip these.

Post # 14
96 posts
Worker bee

we arent doing them!

Post # 15
1115 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: September 2017 - Mississauga Convention Centre

We would pay the extra cost, we would just like to make sure that we would like our photographs, you could use these pictures as  the save the date.

The topic ‘Engagement photos – necessary or not?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors