(Closed) Halo or No Halo?

• colld88
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: April 2016

No halo. So classic and elegant

• MiniMeow
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: April 2017 - City, State

I vote no halo. I think the second pic is perfect.

• goldshine
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: December 2016

No halo, if it is a beautiful stone it needs to stand alone

• schmeckpepper
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: July 2012

Love the halo with no side diamonds!! My pear is like that! So elegant!!

• Astra
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: June 2014

schmeckpepper:   No halo.  The stone is gorgeous as is!!

• NFLwidow
• 5 years ago

If it were me, I’d keep it without a halo.

Having said that, a halo of alternating rubies and diamonds would be lovely.

😉

• Willow90
• 5 years ago

No halo! Always no halo 🙂

• MrsSparkleBee13
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: December 2013

I love plain shank halos (I have one) but I think the shank is too thick for a halo. So in this case I prefer the solitaire 

• cherylashelton1
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: September 2016 - The Wagar Farm B&B

It seems like every ring I see lately has a halo. If you are all about being on trend go with the halo, if you are more about classic elegance, go no halo.

• Robyn0214
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: November 2009 - New York, NY

I would go without a halo.

• mrsmay07
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: May 2007

I’m another vote for a solitaire! It’s a beautiful diamond, and I just love the classic elegance of a solitaire. Plus, you don’t have to worry about a teeny stone falling out and the possibilities are endless for a wedding band!

• CaptainSpaulding
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: December 2011

I prefer the solitare. If you are happy with finger coverage with that stone alone, go for the simple look.

• Eirene00
• 5 years ago

• Wedding: June 2017

Halo. Halos are so pretty! Love them.

• beetruz13
• 5 years ago

I love the halo!!!!