posted 3 months ago in Rings
Post # 31
141 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: August 2002

I think for the woman who has everything it would be a nice change. But waaaay down on the list. For understated bling I prefer this rutilated quartz!

Post # 32
7332 posts
Busy Beekeeper
  • Wedding: July 2016

I’d prefer that cut if it were an emerald or something opaque.  Cool cut, just doesn’t really bring out much in the diamond.

Post # 33
106 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: December 2011

Very beautiful!

Post # 34
4627 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: December 2011

I love the look, but I would want a different cut diamond, and maybe get this in white sapphire or moissanite or something. I just feel it would be a waste of the fire of a diamond, and the price, for this look. But I DO LOVE the look 🙂

Post # 35
172 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: November 2018

To me it looks like a very pretty piece of glass. I wouldn’t pay “diamond ” prices for it.

Post # 36
1264 posts
Bumble bee

The origin of portrait cut diamonds is literal – they were used as a frame with a tiny picture or painting behind it.


Leave a comment

Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

Find Amazing Vendors