(Closed) Having no bridesmaids, because of budget.

posted 6 years ago in Bridesmaids
  • poll: Would you have a wedding with no Bridesmaids?
    Yes : (17 votes)
    63 %
    No! : (9 votes)
    33 %
    Other : (1 votes)
    4 %
  • Post # 3
    2965 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: April 2013

    Given your situation I think not having a Bridal Party is for the best, however, my family would KILL me if I didn’t have a Bridal Party. I’m only having 3 BMs. As for the 6 month old, your 4 year old could pull her on a white decorated wedding wagon:

    Post # 5
    4439 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: January 2013 - Harbourfront Grand Hall

    @sosewmama:  You can definitely have a wedding with no bridal party!

    However it sounds like you already DO have a wedding party in place!

    Why did they expect your mom to pay for their dresses?  $130 is very reasonable for a Bridesmaid or Best Man dress IMO.  Does your Fiance also not want anyone standing up with him?  

    You could tell everyone that for budget reasons you are not going to have a bridal party but that may not go over well…

    Post # 6
    274 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: December 2012

    what’s the point of them anyway? Drama?

    Post # 7
    2965 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: April 2013

     You could show her the pics and see what she thinks of the idea or you could have your mom pull the wagon. I have 3 children (6, 4 and 20 months) myself so I know how it is!

    Post # 8
    601 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: March 2013

    @lindseyl06:  cuuuuttteeeee!  So tempted to “borrow” one of my friends babies and do this!

    Post # 9
    3039 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    I’m from Sweden where you often skip the bridesmaids & only use flower girls. Had we know more kids the right age (so not just babies); I would probably have opted for that because it’s just SO cute!

    The topic ‘Having no bridesmaids, because of budget.’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors