Post # 1
Hi guys my fiance and I are on a tight budget as we are paying for everything ourselves and buying a house all in the same year… I have recieved a few quotes and so far what I can afford are the following:
Melissa Lauren: $845 for all day coverage with all pics on cd with rights and e session
His Eyes Photography : $1099 for 7 hours of coverage and I think all pics with rights and possible e-session
Lora Rodgers: S1500 engagement session, online gallery, all day coverage and cd with all photos and writes
Orlando Wedding Photographer | Lora Rodgers
i am also open to recommendations but my budget is 1200 I am splurging with 1500.
Post # 3
@kvassell1987: I like His Eyes Photography best – photos have the most style. The first and last ones don’t feel quite there to me…
Post # 4
@kvassell1987: I actually really like the third one, the second one is not bad, but if I had to chose one for my wedding it would be the third. Please run far, far away from the first one, some of the photos she has on her website aren’t even in focus, and she uses over editing to try an compensate for it.
Post # 5
I am a wedding photographer so I thought I would chime in with my opinion!
My personal favourite is the third option-Lora Rodgers. She is the most expensive, but her style looks the best to me. I can tell she has high quality imagery and she has a more candid/natural style which is my style as well (so I may be a little bias). I would go for the splurge!
What style of photography do you like? You have to consider that. I feel like the second option- in his eyes, is very posed and unnatural, which some people like, but personally I would want a photographer that would capture me being myself and not have me pose in all these modelly ways, but in general the quality of photography is good, i just don’t agree with the posing she gets her brides and grooms to do.
I personally would stay clear of the first one based on the work on her website being bad quality, Though I do have to say looking at her fb page at more recent work it looks like she’s coming along. The quality isn’t bad in her more recent work and the work is better than most photographers in my area for that price range. I wouldn’t completely rule them out just yet. I would probably chose this company as my second option if you couldn’t afford Lora Rodgers
I hope I helped you a bit! Good luck 🙂
P.S- I’m not just saying this because I’m a photographer, I’m saying it because I’ve heard this from many brides, don’t “settle” on your photographer! At the end of the day your images are all you will have left of your wedding and you will regret it if you don’t love them!
Post # 6
Thank you guys for the awesome feedback…
Post # 7
The third photographer is WAY better than the other two.
Post # 8
@continuumphotography: +1 the third photographer is the best.
Not surprisingly, although this REALLY didn’t influence my opinion, the skill levels very clearly go up as the price goes up. The first photographer is um… if you can’t say something nice don’t say anything at all. The second photographer seems decent, but her images are a bit washed out and I don’t care for that. I prefer bright, true colors. The third photographer looks pretty professional and seems to have a good eye.
You don’t always get what you pay for… but in wedding photography, you really do. Between those three it’s the third photographer hands down (said as a pro photog).
Post # 9
1 & 2 are suitable for the price. Thier pricing is in line with what they offer and I’ll leave at that. The first one has popped up on the bee a time or two.
Im on board wth number 3.
OP have you thought about a bit less coverage with someone you think you cant afford? You can probably get some one great for $1500 for 4/5 hours instead of a full day. This price wouldn’t get you extras but you’d probably get the pictures for print on disc/drive.
Post # 10
#3 but ask to see a few whole weddings and pay attention to what her reception shooting looks like. Ilook much easier to make things look good well lit indoors than in a crappily lit reception or a dim church. Make sure those skills are there!
Post # 11
#3. They’re underpricing by at least $1,000 – hope they’ll see this comment when they trace back all the activity on their site to this page!
The others . . . no comment. Except . . . if they see this . . . STOP using music on your website (that you probably don’t have a license to use in the first place). Saw a photographer get hit with a 5 figure lawsuit for doing the same thing.
Post # 12
@mariematt: Yikes lol. I don’t even have speakers on my photography computer, but I’d never put music on my website anyway. I think in general it’s more annoying on websites than helpful.
Post # 13
- Wedding: September 2013 - Creek club at ion, SC
Lora Rogers is obviously the best. But I dont really see anythng wrong with number two except the music, in fact i quite like the style. Please dont go with number one
Post # 14
#3 by far for me. Photos are crisp and composition is good. Those are the two must haves In My Humble Opinion before comparing photographic styles
#2 would be my second choice but I get the impression from looking at their pics that they are using effects to hide photograph flaws rather than to enhance them. A lot of their pics look quite blurry
#1 – the low charge rate is actually fair for the quality you are receiving, but I wouldn’t recommend them if photos are very important to you
Post # 15
Post # 16
I would pick #2 or #3.I think number 2 does a great job and falls within your budget.I would pass on #1 and #4.Good luck.