(Closed) Help me decided on a stone size/setting?

posted 4 years ago in Rings
  • poll:
    8x6 with plain shank : (13 votes)
    22 %
    8x6 with pave shank : (10 votes)
    17 %
    9x7 with plain shank : (21 votes)
    35 %
    9x7 with pave shank : (16 votes)
    27 %
  • Post # 16
    1291 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: June 2018 - Omaha, NE

    rosesareyellowandpink:  My future ring has this amazing 360 view thing that’s new on moco, and that SOLD me on it, especially in rose gold! http://www.moissaniteco.com/classic-radiantemerald-forever-brilliant-halo-engagement-ring-p-18851.html

    There’s a plain shank one with a 360 view too! http://www.moissaniteco.com/embrace-radiantemerald-forever-brilliant-halo-engagement-ring-p-16208.html 

    I could watch them go round and round alllllll day lol

    hopefully that helps you make up your mind, I know it’s torture 🙂


    Post # 17
    736 posts
    Busy bee

    Plain shank emerald in the 9×7! Plain shank with a pave wedding band is gorgeous and the halo week help give it that bit of extra sparkle with those nice bold flashes of light from the emerald. 

    Post # 19
    52 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: July 2018

    I keep go back and forth between 8×6 and 9×7 for oval, it’s so hard to choose!! I’m not sure about those sizes for your stone shape either, but I vote for the pave shank! Love love LOVE pave shanks, for some reason I’m just not a fan of plain shanks at all. But that’s just my personal opinion, I love sparkle so what can I say lol

    The topic ‘Help me decided on a stone size/setting?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors