Post # 1
Okay so this ring is from BlueNile.com. I chose the setting & the emerald cut.. Wanted to know your guys opinion? I was planning on going with a solitaire instead but thought the side stones look really cute with the emerald. The Center stone is a 0.95 emerald cut – Very Good Cut – H Color – VVS1 Clarity . I’m a size 4 , what do you guys think? 😀
Post # 2
I think it is absolutely lovely, and I have an Emerald cut stone, it’s not a diamond, and I love it. They are lovely as a solitaire or sidestone, so that’s personal preference – So my vote is go for the emerald cut!!
Post # 3
Emerald cut is so pretty! Very nice ring!
Post # 5
its beautiful! I love three stones 🙂
Post # 7
I love emerald cuts! They have an old world beauty about them, and I also get self-conscious about how my Ring Bearer glitters. If I could start over, I’d get a stepcut!
mzwiggy: Are the side stones in that ring princess cut?
Post # 8
I think it’s nice, but step cut stones look best in very simple settings.
Also, their beauty doesn’t show in it’s fullest potential in such a small size.
It still is very nice though.
Post # 9
mzwiggy: It’s very nice! I’m a solitaire lover, and would probably let that .95 shine on it’s own..that’s a nice size!
Post # 10
flowercrowns: yes princess cut side Stones
Post # 11
irina-noelle: is .95 really small? I’m a size 4 so I was hoping It wouldn’t be too small for me /:
But I will have some more thought into it. Maybe I may end up with a solitaire.
Post # 12
I think it will look amazing on your small fingers.. .95 carat is a nice size plus you have the other side stones too..I think you will be very happy with it!
Post # 13
And there is another bee on here that has a gorgeous 3 stone emerald cut ring and it looks fabulous with the side stones…I think .95 is plenty big enough for you and will be perfect!!
Post # 14
It’s okay. I’d prefer if the side stones were emerald too and not princess, but that’s just me.
I also always wondered why emerald cuts don’t shin or sparkle; they seem more like baguettes to me.