(Closed) Hourglass shape: flowwy and romantic vs. Form-fitting and sexy

posted 10 years ago in Dress
Post # 16
445 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: July 2013

@Gigi03:  post pictures!

Post # 17
23 posts
  • Wedding: September 2012

Ummm the second one!!! (Martina Liana 396)  I have been on a dress hunt FOREVER and have tried on a zillion dresses.  I put this one and it just said YES YES YES!  The designer pic doesn’t even do it justice!  I BOUGHT IT!  It is still flowy and romantic I would say……… it just has a more sophisticated waist.  I am also having an extremely large church/ballroom wedding and this dress is just perfect!!!  I am just altering the neckline a little bit to make it a little more sweatheart and I added a different sash (with some bling) to give it some elegance!

Post # 18
5229 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: March 2012 - Pelican Grand Beach Resort

Without pictures of it on you, it’s hard to say for sure, but as a general rule, if you are bigger on the bottom than on the top, you should choose gowns that will emphasize your bust and waist, not your hips, so that means usually not fitted through the hips, but each body is different.  I’d suggest A-line or ball gown.

Post # 21
4 posts
  • Wedding: April 2014

Does anyone have pics of the original belt that comes with the ML 396 (the second one)?  Which is my vote by the way 🙂


The topic ‘Hourglass shape: flowwy and romantic vs. Form-fitting and sexy’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors