(Closed) How many kids would you have if money was no object?

posted 3 years ago in Pregnancy
  • poll: How many kids would you have if money was no object?
    1 : (27 votes)
    8 %
    2 : (90 votes)
    28 %
    3 : (77 votes)
    24 %
    4 : (93 votes)
    29 %
    5 : (16 votes)
    5 %
    6 : (12 votes)
    4 %
    7 : (3 votes)
    1 %
    8 : (2 votes)
    1 %
    9+ : (5 votes)
    2 %
  • Post # 61
    3332 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: September 2017

    0. More $ for me

    Post # 62
    287 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: September 2013

    2. The idea of my husband and I being outnumbered by my children sounds like a nightmare.

    Post # 63
    443 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: October 2016


    I’d have four probably. Fi and I have talked about it and I think 2-3 has been generally what we’ve said we’d like but if I had all the money in the world and never had to worry about the financial side of raising children I’d probably just keep having them. Ha

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by  nattybeee.
    Post # 64
    3092 posts
    Sugar bee

    I have two.

    If I had millions of dollars, I would still have my two only (a boy and a girl).  I would not trade mine for all the gold in China but I cannot be paid to have more kids.

    Post # 65
    405 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: June 2016

    If money weren’t an object, I could hire people to help chauffeur to practice, school, get help with tutoring, clean house, meal prep and have pay for medical billls/best health insurance. Heck, I’d hire a “wife” for me lol. 

    I’d have 5-6 kids. 

    Post # 66
    960 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2015 - Historic Chapel

    I would have 3 or 4. I’m a single child an I hate it lol, so I would love a big family.

    Post # 67
    1606 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: August 2017


    But I might try to have four anyway and just see how it goes…haha

    Post # 68
    2564 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: December 2009

    If money and age weren’t an issue (i’m 34), we would have liked to have had 4-5 biological kids, along with adopting children.  However, I’m 34 and no kids yet, so the 4-5 biological kids doesn’t look like it’s going to happen.  So, we’re thinking 1-2 bio kids along with adopting (no set number there.  Whether it be 1 or open to sibling sets, we’re happy either way).

    Post # 69
    4258 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: February 2009

    Carolsays:  Thank you.  🙂  But I am in Canada, and it is a bit different here.  There are just less kinds in foster care in general, and those that are tend to get placed with extended family as soon as possible.  It sounds good, but in reality, the system leaves a lot of kids no better off, but still not eligible for adoption.  

    Post # 70
    40 posts

    Two would be my limit, even if money is no object.

    Post # 71
    15 posts
    • Wedding: July 2017

    NONE Nada Zero lol

    Post # 72
    15 posts
    • Wedding: July 2017

    Thank God I’m not the only woman on here that answered NO KIDS! 

    Post # 73
    1434 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: April 2016

    Two or three but I would still be fearful of pregnancy, labour and whether I have it in me to raise an infant so may still seriously adoption of slightly older children (I have close family who have adopted and realise it’s not an easy option but may be better suited to us).

    Post # 74
    3868 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: November 2016

    I can’t really relate to this poll because I can’t imagine not wanting to have a career or having kids at 22. I would be very unhappy in that scenario. I chose 2 because Fiance and I would like to have 2 in the future, but would be ok with not having any.

    Post # 75
    1272 posts
    Bumble bee

    Still just one. Money isn’t the issue, patience is.

    The topic ‘How many kids would you have if money was no object?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors